Literature DB >> 7676499

Experimental orthotopic corneal xenotransplantation in the rat. Mechanisms of graft rejection.

D F Larkin1, T Takano, S D Standfield, K A Williams.   

Abstract

Orthotopic penetrating guinea pig to rat and chicken to rat corneal xenografts were performed to examine the nature of the host response. Guinea pig to rat xenografts failed at a median of day 3 after surgery. A similar but slightly accelerated pattern of failure was seen in guinea pig xenografts performed in prevascularized recipient rat corneas. Chicken to rat xenografts failed at a median of day 2 after grafting. Rat corneal isograft controls survived indefinitely. Corneal endothelial cells were visible by silver staining on the xenografts immediately after operation, which indicates that failure was not due to loss of these cells during surgery. Histopathology and immunoperoxidase staining indicated that xenograft failure in euthymic recipients was characterized by early corneal epithelial and endothelial cell damage, granulocytic infiltration, and hemorrhage from recipient corneal and iris capillaries, followed at 7-14 days by infiltration with T cells, macrophages, and eosinophils. An accelerated pattern of graft failure was also observed in guinea pig grafts into homozygous nude rat recipients, which suggests that preformed anti-donor antibody and complement were responsible for some of the early graft damage. Flow cytometry demonstrated the presence of pre-existing natural antibodies to guinea pig and chicken lymphocytes and erythrocytes, as expected from other studies. Immunohistochemistry showed the presence of rat IgG2a, IgG1, and IgM, but not IgD deposited on grafts in immunocompetent recipients on the first postoperative day. We conclude that orthotopic corneal xenografts undergo substantial accelerated damage mediated by pre-existing antibody, followed at 7-14 days by a cell-mediated response that causes further destruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7676499     DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199509000-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  6 in total

Review 1.  Xenotransplantation--the future of corneal transplantation?

Authors:  Hidetaka Hara; David K C Cooper
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.651

Review 2.  Corneal blindness and xenotransplantation.

Authors:  Vladimir Lamm; Hidetaka Hara; Alex Mammen; Deepinder Dhaliwal; David K C Cooper
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 3.907

3.  Corneal graft rejection occurs despite Fas ligand expression and apoptosis of infiltrating cells.

Authors:  K A Williams; S D Standfield; J R Smith; D J Coster
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Initial in vitro investigation of the human immune response to corneal cells from genetically engineered pigs.

Authors:  Hidetaka Hara; Naoko Koike; Cassandra Long; Jordan Piluek; Danny S Roh; Nirmala SundarRaj; James L Funderburgh; Yoshiaki Mizuguchi; Kumiko Isse; Carol J Phelps; Suyapa F Ball; David L Ayares; David K C Cooper
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 5.  Immunology and Donor-Specific Antibodies in Corneal Transplantation.

Authors:  Joanna Major; Bartosz Foroncewicz; Jacek Paweł Szaflik; Krzysztof Mucha
Journal:  Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz)       Date:  2021-11-06       Impact factor: 4.291

6.  The role of cyclosporine and mycophenolate in an orthotopic porcine-to-rat corneal xenotransplantation.

Authors:  Hyeon Il Lee; Mee Kum Kim; Joo Youn Oh; Jung Hwa Ko; Hyun Ju Lee; Won Ryang Wee; Jin Hak Lee
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.153

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.