Literature DB >> 7676078

MSU Rurality Index: development and evaluation. Montana State University.

C Weinert1, R J Boik.   

Abstract

The construction and validation of a residence-based index of the degree of rurality are reported. The MSU Rurality Index is a locally normal index and assigns a quantitative measure of rurality to each participant in a study. Data required to compute the index are minimal; only two variables need be measured. Statistical analysis effort required to compute the index is somewhat more intensive than usual, but this tradeoff between data collection and data analysis seems sensible. Data collection is generally more expensive than data analysis. The two required variables, county population and distance to emergency care, are optimally transformed to achieve normality and weighted to achieve validity. A measure of departure from normality is automatically obtained while constructing the index. A positive score reflects a rural residence and a negative score reflects an urban residence relative to the group under study. A score of zero reflects average rurality. Reliability and construct validity were examined using two data sets. The MSU Rurality Index has high test-retest reliability, is appropriately related to a set of ordered categories concerning place of residence, and is as or more strongly related to these categories than alternative indices computed from distance or population alone. The validity of the MSU Rurality Index does not appear to be compromised by its parsimony. Even though the MSU Rurality Index is based on only two variables, it was found to be associated with various health care variables as strongly or more strongly than an 11 variable county-based index developed in Texas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7676078     DOI: 10.1002/nur.4770180510

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Nurs Health        ISSN: 0160-6891            Impact factor:   2.228


  15 in total

1.  Geographic issues in cardiac rehabilitation utilization: a narrative review.

Authors:  Yvonne W Leung; Janette Brual; Alison Macpherson; Sherry L Grace
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 4.078

2.  Complementary therapy use among older rural adults.

Authors:  Jean Shreffler-Grant; Clarann Weinert; Elizabeth Nichols; Bette Ide
Journal:  Public Health Nurs       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.462

Review 3.  Rural deprivation: reflecting reality.

Authors:  J C Farmer; A G Baird; L Iversen
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Electronic screening for mental health in rural primary care: feasibility and user testing.

Authors:  Sarah P Farrell; Lisa M Zerull; Irma H Mahone; Stephanie Guerlain; Doruk Akan; Emily Hauenstein; John Schorling
Journal:  Comput Inform Nurs       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.985

5.  'My husband would not help me, so I was driving over there': older rural women experiencing breast cancer with a non-supportive intimate partner.

Authors:  E M Sawin
Journal:  Rural Remote Health       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 1.759

6.  Implementing common data elements across studies to advance research.

Authors:  Marlene Z Cohen; Cheryl Bagley Thompson; Bernice Yates; Lani Zimmerman; Carol H Pullen
Journal:  Nurs Outlook       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 3.250

7.  An individual-based rurality measure and its health application: A case study of Latino immigrants in North Florida, USA.

Authors:  Liang Mao; Jeanne-Marie R Stacciarini; Rebekah Smith; Brenda Wiens
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Evolution of a conceptual model for adaptation to chronic illness.

Authors:  Clarann Weinert; Shirley Cudney; Amber Spring
Journal:  J Nurs Scholarsh       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.176

9.  A comparison of the workload of rural and urban primary care physicians in Germany: analysis of a questionnaire survey.

Authors:  Jost Steinhaeuser; Stefanie Joos; Joachim Szecsenyi; Antje Miksch
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 2.497

10.  Rural and urban differences in stage at diagnosis of colorectal and lung cancers.

Authors:  N C Campbell; A M Elliott; L Sharp; L D Ritchie; J Cassidy; J Little
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2001-04-06       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.