J Erblich1, M Earleywine. 1. Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles 90089-1061, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study was developed to offer direct support for the Josephs and Steele attention-allocation model. The model suggests that alcohol consumption limits attentional resources to the most salient environmental cue. METHOD: Forty men participated in a study designed to test the model using measures of memory and attention during ethanol intoxication. Twenty completed memory tests in the presence of a background distractor and 20 completed the tests without a distractor, in two sessions: once while intoxicated (80 mg/dl BAC) and once while sober. RESULTS: A significant Distraction x Intoxication interaction indicated that ethanol-related differences in recall occurred only in the absence of distraction. Distraction impaired subjects only when they were sober. CONCLUSIONS: Results support the Josephs and Steele attention-allocation model. Findings are discussed in broad terms of an individual's cognitive capabilities when intoxicated and in terms of risk for later alcoholism.
OBJECTIVE: This study was developed to offer direct support for the Josephs and Steele attention-allocation model. The model suggests that alcohol consumption limits attentional resources to the most salient environmental cue. METHOD: Forty men participated in a study designed to test the model using measures of memory and attention during ethanol intoxication. Twenty completed memory tests in the presence of a background distractor and 20 completed the tests without a distractor, in two sessions: once while intoxicated (80 mg/dl BAC) and once while sober. RESULTS: A significant Distraction x Intoxication interaction indicated that ethanol-related differences in recall occurred only in the absence of distraction. Distraction impaired subjects only when they were sober. CONCLUSIONS: Results support the Josephs and Steele attention-allocation model. Findings are discussed in broad terms of an individual's cognitive capabilities when intoxicated and in terms of risk for later alcoholism.
Authors: Remco W M Zoethout; Wilson L Delgado; Annelies E Ippel; Albert Dahan; Joop M A van Gerven Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Lara A Ray; Spencer Bujarski; James MacKillop; Kelly E Courtney; Peter M Monti; Karen Miotto Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2012-12-14 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Lara A Ray; Spencer Bujarski; Lindsay M Squeglia; James R Ashenhurst; Raymond F Anton Journal: Alcohol Alcohol Date: 2014-01-13 Impact factor: 2.826