Literature DB >> 7674405

Evolution of management of major hepatic trauma: identification of patterns of injury.

D C Boone1, M Federle, T R Billiar, A O Udekwu, A B Peitzman.   

Abstract

Nonoperative management of hemodynamically stable patients following blunt hepatic trauma identified by computed tomography (CT) has been reported in up to 20% of patients presenting with hepatic injury, predominantly low grade. We reviewed 128 consecutive adult patients sustaining blunt hepatic trauma with the hypothesis that severe hepatic injuries (grades III to V) could be safely managed nonoperatively and to determine anatomic pattern and severity of hepatic injuries. Sixty-two of the 128 patients (47%) went directly for laparotomy, based on physical findings or positive peritoneal lavage. Sixty-six patients were hemodynamically stable and underwent abdominal CT scanning; 70% (46 of 66) were successfully managed nonoperatively. Fifty-one percent of grade III and IV injuries were treated nonoperatively. However, the majority of patients with grade V injuries were unstable, and 92% required laparotomy. Twenty-six of 46 patients treated nonoperatively (56%) had injury to the posterior segment of the right lobe of the liver or a "split liver." In retrospect, only 33% of patients with hepatic injury required laparotomy for therapy of the liver injury. Hemodynamic stability and anatomic pattern of injury on presentation were important factors in successful nonoperative management of hepatic injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7674405     DOI: 10.1097/00005373-199508000-00026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  9 in total

1.  Blunt hepatic injury: a paradigm shift from operative to nonoperative management in the 1990s.

Authors:  A K Malhotra; T C Fabian; M A Croce; T J Gavin; K A Kudsk; G Minard; F E Pritchard
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Does splenectomy protect against immune-mediated complications in blunt trauma patients?

Authors:  Marie Crandall; Michael B Shapiro; Michael A West
Journal:  Mol Med       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 6.354

3.  Non-operative management of blunt liver trauma: feasible and safe also in centres with a low trauma incidence.

Authors:  Gustav Norrman; Bobby Tingstedt; Mikael Ekelund; Roland Andersson
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.647

4.  Liver trauma: experience in 348 cases.

Authors:  Jing-mou Gao; Ding-yuan Du; Xing-ji Zhao; Guo-long Liu; Jun Yang; Shan-hong Zhao; Xi Lin
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2003-05-13       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Classification of liver and pancreatic trauma.

Authors:  Gabriel C Oniscu; Rowan W Parks; O James Garden
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.647

6.  Long-term follow-up after non-operative management of biloma due to blunt liver injury.

Authors:  Nobuichiro Tamura; Satoshi Ishihara; Akira Kuriyama; Shigeru Watanabe; Koichiro Suzuki
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Evaluating a conservative approach to managing liver injuries in Kashmir, India.

Authors:  Fazl Qadir Parray; Mohd Lateef Wani; Ajaz Ahmad Malik; Natasha Thakur; Rouf Ahmad Wani; Sameer H Naqash; Nisar Ahmad Chowdri; Khursheed Alam Wani; Akram Hussain Bijli; Ifat Irshad
Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock       Date:  2011-10

Review 8.  New technology in the management of liver trauma.

Authors:  Konstantinos Chatoupis; Glikeria Papadopoulou; Ioannis Kaskarelis
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2013

9.  Liver injury following blunt abdominal trauma: a new mechanism-driven classification.

Authors:  J E Slotta; C Justinger; O Kollmar; C Kollmar; T Schäfer; M K Schilling
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 2.549

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.