Literature DB >> 7674398

A risk analysis of stress ulceration after trauma.

R K Simons1, D B Hoyt, R J Winchell, T Holbrook, A B Eastman.   

Abstract

Prophylaxis for stress ulceration is considered standard care for most critically ill patients, but may be overutilized. We determined the incidence of stress ulceration in 33,637 major trauma patients treated in a regionalized trauma system from 1985 to 1991 using trauma registry data and chart review. Injury-related risk factors for stress ulceration and other associated infectious and organ failure complications were identified by regression analysis. Clinical stress ulceration developed in 57 patients (0.17%) despite prophylaxis. Eighteen patients (0.05%) developed severe ulceration with either gastroduodenal perforation (3 patients) or a > 2 U blood transfusion requirement (16 patients). Independent risk factors with odds ratios (OR) were identified as follows: Injury Severity Score (ISS) > or = 16, OR = 12.6; spinal cord injury, OR = 2.0; and age > 55, OR = 2.4. Other serious complications, including pneumonia, sepsis, and organ failure (adult respiratory distress syndrome and renal and hepatic failure), were significantly associated with the development of stress ulceration. Clinically significant stress ulceration after trauma is uncommon, but occurs despite prophylaxis. Severe injury (ISS > 16) and spinal cord injury were identified as independent injury-related risk factors. All patients with severe ulceration had either one of these injury-related risk factors or a significant infectious complication or organ failure. Standard prophylaxis may be inadequate in high-risk patients, who should be targeted for increased surveillance and aggressive prophylaxis. On the other hand, routine prophylaxis in low-risk patients may be overutilized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7674398     DOI: 10.1097/00005373-199508000-00017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  6 in total

1.  Stress ulcer prophylaxis guidelines: Are they being implemented in Lebanese health care centers?

Authors:  Abeer Zeitoun; Maya Zeineddine; Hani Dimassi
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2011-08-06

Review 2.  Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Neurocritical Care.

Authors:  Jeffrey F Barletta; Alicia J Mangram; Joseph F Sucher; Victor Zach
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.210

3.  Risk factors for ulcer development in patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia: a prospective two year follow up study of 209 patients.

Authors:  P-I Hsu; K-H Lai; G-H Lo; H-H Tseng; C-C Lo; H-C Chen; W-L Tsai; H-S Jou; N-J Peng; C-H Chien; J-L Chen; P-N Hsu
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Stress ulcer prophylaxis in trauma patients.

Authors:  Jeffrey F Barletta; Brian L Erstad; John B Fortune
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2002-09-25       Impact factor: 9.097

5.  Impact of blood type, functional polymorphism (T-1676C) of the COX-1 gene promoter and clinical factors on the development of peptic ulcer during cardiovascular prophylaxis with low-dose aspirin.

Authors:  Pin-Yao Wang; Hsiu-Ping Chen; Angela Chen; Feng-Woei Tsay; Kwok-Hung Lai; Sung-Shuo Kao; Wen-Chi Chen; Chao-Hung Kuo; Nan-Jing Peng; Hui-Hwa Tseng; Ping-I Hsu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  A revised risk analysis of stress ulcers in burn patients receiving ulcer prophylaxis.

Authors:  Young Hwan Choi; Jong Ho Lee; Jae Jun Shin; Young Soon Cho
Journal:  Clin Exp Emerg Med       Date:  2015-12-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.