Literature DB >> 7674254

Evaluating measurement responsiveness.

M H Liang1.   

Abstract

Strategies to improve responsiveness of quantitative questionnaires and methods for evaluating responsiveness are reviewed. Current methods of evaluating responsiveness are not standardized and are themselves unevaluated. A conceptual model of assessing responsiveness is proposed.

Mesh：

Year:  1995        PMID： 7674254

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rheumatol        ISSN： 0315-162X            Impact factor:   4.666


  34 in total

1.  Evaluation of Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 Taiwan version in assessing elderly patients with hip fracture.

Authors:  Yea-Ing Lotus Shyu; Jui-fen Rachel Lu; Jersey Liang
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Development and validation of a cross-cultural questionnaire to evaluate nonulcer dyspepsia: the Porto Alegre Dyspeptic Symptoms Questionnaire (PADYQ).

Authors:  Guilherme Becker Sander; Luiz Edmundo Mazzoleni; Carlos Fernando Magalhães Francesconi; André Castagna Wortmann; Eduardo André Ott; Alexandro Theil; Piccoli Vicenzo Da Cruz; Angela Cristiane Da Silva; Leandro Oliveira; Simone Beheregaray; Simone Matioti; Gustavo Somm; José Roberto Goldim
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Comparison of the responsiveness of the Harris Hip Score with generic measures for hip function in osteoarthritis of the hip.

Authors:  H L Hoeksma; C H M Van Den Ende; H K Ronday; A Heering; F C Breedveld
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 19.103

4.  Measurement properties of the Dizziness Handicap Inventory by cross-sectional and longitudinal designs.

Authors:  Anne-Lise Tamber; Kjersti T Wilhelmsen; Liv Inger Strand
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 3.186

5.  Validation of manual muscle testing and a subset of eight muscles for adult and juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies.

Authors:  Lisa G Rider; Deloris Koziol; Edward H Giannini; Minal S Jain; Michaele R Smith; Kristi Whitney-Mahoney; Brian M Feldman; Susan J Wright; Carol B Lindsley; Lauren M Pachman; Maria L Villalba; Daniel J Lovell; Suzanne L Bowyer; Paul H Plotz; Frederick W Miller; Jeanne E Hicks
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.794

6.  A modified QuickDASH-9 provides a valid outcome instrument for upper limb function.

Authors:  C Philip Gabel; Michael Yelland; Markus Melloh; Brendan Burkett
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Asymmetric responsiveness of disability and health-related quality of life to improvement versus decline in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Dronacharya Lamichhane; Ann L Gruber-Baldini; Stephen G Reich; Lisa M Shulman
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  The responsiveness of the Shoulder Disability Questionnaire.

Authors:  D A van der Windt; G J van der Heijden; A F de Winter; B W Koes; W Devillé; L M Bouter
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 9.  A review of functional status measures for workers with upper extremity disorders.

Authors:  D F Salerno; C Copley-Merriman; T N Taylor; J Shinogle; R M Schulz
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.402

10.  Interpreting differences in quality of life: the FACT-H&N in laryngeal cancer patients.

Authors:  Jolie Ringash; Andrea Bezjak; Brian O'Sullivan; Donald A Redelmeier
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.147
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.