Literature DB >> 7673916

Patellofemoral contact pressures exceed the compressive yield strength of UHMWPE in total knee arthroplasties.

T Takeuchi1, V K Lathi, A M Khan, W C Hayes.   

Abstract

To address mechanisms involved in wear and permanent deformation of patellofemoral components in total knee arthroplasties, a previously reported knee joint loading model and pressure-sensitive film were used to measure patellofemoral contact areas and pressures in human cadaver knee joints after implantation with six different total knee joint designs. The joints were tested at three different Q angles (physiologic, -10 degrees, and +10 degrees) and four different flexion angles (30 degrees, 60 degrees, 90 degrees, and 120 degrees). Patellofemoral contact areas at normal Q angles ranged from 0.13 to 0.68 cm2 and increased with flexion angle up to 90 degrees. These contact areas differed significantly with flexion angle but not with Q angle. Variations in contact area with type of knee system were only marginally significant (P < .04), and post hoc tests showed no significant differences between individual knee designs. Contact pressures at normal Q angle also increased with flexion angle and ranged from 10 MPa to more than 49 MPa. Contact pressures at flexion angles greater than 60 degrees were, for all systems, well in excess of the compressive yield strength of ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene and at least three to four times greater than the recommended maximum compressive stress level of 10 MPa.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7673916     DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(05)80186-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  9 in total

1.  No difference in patellar kinematics between fixed-bearing cruciate-retaining and cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty: a cadaveric investigation.

Authors:  Armin Keshmiri; Günther Maderbacher; Achim Benditz; Werner Müller; Joachim Grifka; Benjamin Craiovan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Effect of an UHMWPE patellar component on stress fields in the patella: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Yeon Soo Lee; Thay Q Lee; Joyce H Keyak
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Stress distribution of the patellofemoral joint in the anatomic V-shape and curved dome-shape femoral component: a comparison of resurfaced and unresurfaced patellae.

Authors:  Chang-Hung Huang; Lin-I Hsu; Ting-Kuo Chang; Tai-Yuan Chuang; Shih-Liang Shih; Yung-Chang Lu; Chen-Sheng Chen; Chun-Hsiung Huang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-12-25       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Increased patellofemoral pressure after TKA: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Ulf G Leichtle; Markus Wünschel; Carmen I Leichtle; Otto Müller; Philipp Kohler; Nikolaus Wülker; Andrea Lorenz
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Understanding the patellofemoral joint in total knee arthroplasty

Authors:  Jacob Matz; Brent A. Lanting; James L. Howard
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 6.  Patellar resurfacing complications in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alfredo Schiavone Panni; Simone Cerciello; Chiara Del Regno; Alessandro Felici; Michele Vasso
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-12-21       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 7.  The controversy of patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: Ibisne in medio tutissimus?

Authors:  Oliver S Schindler
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-04-08       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Influence of Different Patellofemoral Design Variations Based on Genesis II Total Knee Endoprosthesis on Patellofemoral Pressure and Kinematics.

Authors:  Ulf G Leichtle; Barbara Lange; Yvonne Herzog; Peter Schnauffer; Carmen I Leichtle; Nikolaus Wülker; Andrea Lorenz
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 1.781

9.  UHMWPE for arthroplasty: past or future?

Authors:  Elena Maria Brach Del Prever; Alessandro Bistolfi; Pierangiola Bracco; Luigi Costa
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2008-12-24
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.