Literature DB >> 7673304

A study to determine the efficacy of treatments for hydrofluoric acid burns.

S T Seyb1, L Noordhoek, S Botens, M M Mani.   

Abstract

Hydrofluoric acid burns are characterized by progressive tissue destruction and severe pain. Fluoride ion chelators, such as salts of calcium and magnesium, have been used to treat these burns. This study was designed to compare the efficacy of several treatment methods that involve the use of these salts. Standard hydrofluoric acid burns were produced on the shaved hindquarters of rats. After being rinsed with water, the chemical burns were treated by one of seven experimental methods. The progress of the chemical burn damage was observed for 1 week by measuring the surface areas of the burns. Calcium gluconate burn jelly, 20% calcium gluconate in water, and 50% aqueous dimethyl sulfoxide did not significantly slow the spread of the burn area. However, subcutaneous injections of calcium gluconate or magnesium sulfate and topical applications of calcium gluconate in a solution of dimethyl sulfoxide significantly slowed the progress of the burns during the first 24 hours and enhanced tissue recovery for the remainder of the observation period. These results indicate that subcutaneous injections of magnesium or calcium salts appear to be more effective than conventional topical applications in the treatment of hydrofluoric acid burns. More significantly, topically applied calcium gluconate combined with a penetration enhancer, such as dimethyl sulfoxide, is as effective as injection treatments in reducing damage caused by hydrofluoric acid.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7673304     DOI: 10.1097/00004630-199505000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Burn Care Rehabil        ISSN: 0273-8481


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of skin effects of immediate treatment modalities in experimentally induced hydrofluoric acid skin burns.

Authors:  Meltem K Songur; Ovunc Akdemir; William C Lineaweaver; Turker Cavusoglu; Murat Ozsarac; Huseyin Aktug; Ecmel Songur; Yigit O Tiftikcioglu
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 2.  A review of hydrofluoric acid burn management.

Authors:  Daniel McKee; Achilleas Thoma; Kristy Bailey; Joel Fish
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 0.947

3.  Limited efficacy of calcium and magnesium in a porcine model of hydrofluoric acid ingestion.

Authors:  Jason A Coffey; Kori L Brewer; Robert Carroll; John Bradfield; William J Meggs
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2007-06

4.  Part 2. Comparison of emergency washing solutions in 70% hydrofluoric acid-burned human skin in an established ex vivo explants model.

Authors:  François Burgher; Laurence Mathieu; Elian Lati; Philippe Gasser; Laurent Peno-Mazzarino; Joël Blomet; Alan H Hall; Howard I Maibach
Journal:  Cutan Ocul Toxicol       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 1.820

5.  Occupational Hydrofluoric Acid Injury from Car and Truck Washing--Washington State, 2001-2013.

Authors:  Carolyn K Reeb-Whitaker; Carly M Eckert; Naomi J Anderson; David K Bonauto
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 17.586

6.  Emissions Control of Hydrochloric and Fluorhydric Acid in cement Factories from Romania.

Authors:  Gheorghe Voicu; Cristian Ciobanu; Irina Aura Istrate; Paula Tudor
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.