Literature DB >> 7673179

Regulation of gene expression at the beginning of mammalian development.

J Y Nothias1, S Majumder, K J Kaneko, M L DePamphilis.   

Abstract

The maternal to zygotic transition can be viewed as a cascade of events that begins when fertilization triggers the zygotic clock that delays early ZGA until formation of a 2-cell embryo. Early ZGA, in turn, appears to be required for expression of late ZGA, and late ZGA is required to form a 4-cell embryo. ZGA in mammals is a time-dependent mechanism rather than a cell cycle-dependent mechanism that delays both transcription and translation of nascent transcripts. Thus, zygotic gene transcripts appear to be handled differently than maternal mRNA, a phenomenon also observed in Xenopus (55). The length of this delay is species-dependent, occurring at the 2-cell stage in mice, the 4-8-cell stage in cows and humans, and the 8-16-cell stage in sheep and rabbits (4). However, concurrent with formation of a 2-cell embryo in the mouse and rabbit (47,56), perhaps in all mammals, a general chromatin-mediated repression of promoter activity appears. Repression factors are inherited by the maternal pronucleus from the oocyte but are absent in the paternal pronucleus and not available until sometime during the transition from a late 1-cell to a 2-cell embryo. This means that paternally inherited genes are exposed to a different environment in fertilized eggs than are maternally inherited genes, a situation that could contribute to genomic imprinting. Chromatin-mediated repression of promoter activity prior to ZGA is similar to what is observed during Xenopus embryogenesis (31,32) and ensures that genes are not expressed until the appropriate time in development when positive acting factors, such as enhancers, can relieve this repression. The ability to use enhancers appears to depend on the acquisition of specific co-activators at the 2-cell stage in mice and perhaps later in other mammals (47,56), concurrent with ZGA. Even then, the mechanism by which enhancers communicate with promoters changes during development (Fig. 2), providing an opportunity for enhancer-mediated stimulating of TATA-less promoters (e.g. housekeeping genes) early during development while eliminating this mechanism later during development.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7673179     DOI: 10.1074/jbc.270.38.22077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  57 in total

1.  Different modes of regulation of transcription and pre-mRNA processing of the structurally juxtaposed homologs, Rnf33 and Rnf35, in eggs and in pre-implantation embryos.

Authors:  Kong-Bung Choo; Huang-Hui Chen; Tiffany Yi-Chen Liu; Chih-Pei Chang
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Soggy, a spermatocyte-specific gene, lies 3.8 kb upstream of and antipodal to TEAD-2, a transcription factor expressed at the beginning of mouse development.

Authors:  K J Kaneko; M L DePamphilis
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-10-15       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 3.  Global gene expression profiling of preimplantation embryos.

Authors:  Toshio Hamatani; Minoru Sh Ko; Mitsutoshi Yamada; Naoaki Kuji; Yuri Mizusawa; Mayumi Shoji; Tomonori Hada; Hironori Asada; Tetsuo Maruyama; Yasunori Yoshimura
Journal:  Hum Cell       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.174

4.  Nuclear translocation and carboxyl-terminal domain phosphorylation of RNA polymerase II delineate the two phases of zygotic gene activation in mammalian embryos.

Authors:  S Bellier; S Chastant; P Adenot; M Vincent; J P Renard; O Bensaude
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1997-10-15       Impact factor: 11.598

5.  The construction of cDNA libraries from human single preimplantation embryos and their use in the study of gene expression during development.

Authors:  J Adjaye; R Daniels; M Monk
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 6.  Transcription factors and aging.

Authors:  A K Roy
Journal:  Mol Med       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 6.354

7.  Developmental acquisition of enhancer function requires a unique coactivator activity.

Authors:  S Majumder; Z Zhao; K Kaneko; M L DePamphilis
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1997-04-01       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  Transient Dux expression facilitates nuclear transfer and induced pluripotent stem cell reprogramming.

Authors:  Lei Yang; Xuefei Liu; Lishuang Song; Anqi Di; Guanghua Su; Chunling Bai; Zhuying Wei; Guangpeng Li
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 8.807

9.  Integrated Analysis of Quantitative Proteome and Transcriptional Profiles Reveals the Dynamic Function of Maternally Expressed Proteins After Parthenogenetic Activation of Buffalo Oocyte.

Authors:  Fumei Chen; Qiang Fu; Liping Pu; Pengfei Zhang; Yulin Huang; Zhen Hou; Zhuangzhuang Xu; Dongrong Chen; Fengling Huang; Tingxian Deng; Xianwei Liang; Yangqing Lu; Ming Zhang
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 5.911

10.  Association between growth dynamics, morphological parameters, the chromosomal status of the blastocysts, and clinical outcomes in IVF PGS cycles with single embryo transfer.

Authors:  Oleksii O Barash; Kristen A Ivani; Susan P Willman; Evan M Rosenbluth; Deborah S Wachs; Mary D Hinckley; Sara Pittenger Reid; Louis N Weckstein
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.