Literature DB >> 7672842

Delay method of implantation enhances implant-bone binding: a comparison with the conventional method.

M Ogiso1, T Tabata, R R Lee, D Borgese.   

Abstract

This report compares the conventional and delay methods of implantation, evaluating the bone formation around a dense apatite implant. In the conventional method, the implant is placed immediately after the cavity is prepared. In the delay technique, the implant is placed 2 weeks after preparation. This study found that many new thin trabeculae and capillaries formed around the cavity during the delay period, while none had formed at the time of implantation using the conventional method. The delay method showed earlier and wider bone formation, and less surrounding fibrous encapsulation. These results indicate that the delay technique can be an efficient method for establishing good bone binding.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7672842

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  2 in total

1.  Evaluation of implants placed immediately or delayed into extraction sites.

Authors:  U S Pal; Neeraj Kumar Dhiman; Geeta Singh; R K Singh; Shadab Mohammad; Laxman R Malkunje
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-01

2.  Comparative evaluation of crestal bone levels following placement of implant in delayed implant bed: An in vivo clinical study.

Authors:  Chhavi Rana; Abhishek Nagpal; Vishwas Bhatia; Jasneet Singh Kalra
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2021-12-13
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.