Literature DB >> 7670979

Classification of clubfoot.

A Diméglio1, H Bensahel, P Souchet, P Mazeau, F Bonnet.   

Abstract

Clubfeet must be classified according to severity to obtain reference points, assess the efficacy of orthopaedic treatment, and analyze the operative results objectively. A scale of 0-20 was established on the basis of four essential parameters: equinus in the sagittal plane, varus deviation in the frontal plane and derotation around the talus of the calcaneo-forefoot (CFF) block and adduction of forefoot on hindfoot in the horizontal plane. Four grades of clubfeet can be individualized: (a) Benign feet so-called "soft-soft feet," grade I, similar to postural feet, with a score of 5 to 1 (these mild feet must be excluded from any statistics as they tend to increase good results); (b) moderate feet, so-called "soft > stiff feet," grade II (reducible but partly resistant, with a score of 5-10); (c) severe feet, so-called "stiff > soft feet," grade III (resistant but partly reducible, with a score of 10-15); and (d) very severe, pseudoarthrogryposic feet, so-called "stiff-stiff feet," grade IV (score of 15-20 points). To avoid risks of errors, our method is based on a very complete checklist and on diagrams. Our training material inculdes an audiovisual package.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7670979     DOI: 10.1097/01202412-199504020-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop B        ISSN: 1060-152X            Impact factor:   1.041


  105 in total

1.  Correction of relapsed or neglected clubfoot using a simple Ilizarov frame.

Authors:  H El Barbary; H Abdel Ghani; M Hegazy
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2004-02-05       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  [Congenital clubfoot].

Authors:  K Weimann-Stahlschmidt; R Krauspe; B Westhoff
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Familial isolated clubfoot is associated with recurrent chromosome 17q23.1q23.2 microduplications containing TBX4.

Authors:  David M Alvarado; Hyuliya Aferol; Kevin McCall; Jason B Huang; Matthew Techy; Jillian Buchan; Janet Cady; Patrick R Gonzales; Matthew B Dobbs; Christina A Gurnett
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Does Strict Adherence to the Ponseti Method Improve Isolated Clubfoot Treatment Outcomes? A Two-institution Review.

Authors:  Nancy H Miller; Patrick M Carry; Bryan J Mark; Glenn H Engelman; Gaia Georgopoulos; Sue Graham; Matthew B Dobbs
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  The role of radiographic measurements in the evaluation of congenital clubfoot surgical results.

Authors:  Marcos William Fridman; Henrique Sodré de Almeida Fialho
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2006-10-18       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  A model for clubfoot based on micro-CT data.

Authors:  Gunther Windisch; Dietmar Salaberger; Walter Rosmarin; Johann Kastner; Gerhard Ulrich Exner; Verena Haldi-Brändle; Friedrich Anderhuber
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 7.  Update on clubfoot: etiology and treatment.

Authors:  Matthew B Dobbs; Christina A Gurnett
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Congenital clubfoot in children after walking age: management and evaluation of 41 feet with the dimeglio score.

Authors:  Zoltan Derzsi; Horea Gozar; Simona Gurzu; Radu Prisca; Ors Nagy
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-12-15

9.  Skeletal muscle contractile gene (TNNT3, MYH3, TPM2) mutations not found in vertical talus or clubfoot.

Authors:  Christina A Gurnett; Farhang Alaee; David Desruisseau; Stephanie Boehm; Matthew B Dobbs
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Correction of arthrogrypotic clubfoot with a modified Ponseti technique.

Authors:  Harold J P van Bosse; Salih Marangoz; Wallace B Lehman; Debra A Sala
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.