Literature DB >> 7670606

Durability of resin bonds to pure titanium.

M Kern1, V P Thompson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the bond strength and bond durability of new adhesive systems to pure titanium.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Plexiglass tubes filled with composite were bonded to titanium discs. Groups of 24 samples were bonded using six different bonding systems. Subgroups of eight bonded samples were stored in an isotonic artificial saliva solution (37 degrees C) for 1, 30, or 150 days. In addition, the 30- and 150-day samples were thermal cycled for 7,500 or 37,500 cycles between 5 degrees C and 55 degrees C, respectively. After these storage conditions, all samples were debonded in tension.
RESULTS: The bond strength of a conventional bisphenol-A glycidyl methacrylate composite to sandblasted titanium was significantly lower than using chemomechanical bonding systems and decreased slightly during the storage time of 150 days. The additional use of a silane on sandblasted titanium resulted in an insignificant increase in bond strength and decreased over storage time to the same level as on sandblasted-only titanium. Statistically significant higher bond strengths were achieved either with the combination of silica coating and use of a conventional bisphenol-A glycidyl methacrylate composite or with the combination of sandblasting and the use of composites modified with a phosphate monomer. In the latter systems, the bond strengths were only limited by the cohesive strength of the composite resins. A new phosphate monomer containing composite showed a tendency to lose cohesive strength over time (statistically not significant).
CONCLUSIONS: Using chemomechanical bonding systems, ie, silica-coating systems or modified composites with adhesive monomers, resulted in 2 to 2.5 times increased bond strength to titanium compared with the bond strength of a conventional bisphenol-A glycidyl methacrylate composite. With chemomechanical bonding systems, the resin bond to titanium was durable over 150 days, even after being stored in water and thermal cycled.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7670606     DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849x.1995.tb00309.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthodont        ISSN: 1059-941X            Impact factor:   2.752


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of Bond Strength in the Different Class of Resin Cements to Cast and CAD/CAM Co-Cr Alloys.

Authors:  Leyla Sadighpour; Azam S Mostafavi; Maryam Pirmoradian; Fatemeh Alipuryalda
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2021-12-26

2.  Effect of adhesive primers on bonding strength of heat cure denture base resin to cast titanium and cobalt-chromium alloy.

Authors:  Su-Sung Kim; Mong-Sook Vang; Hong-So Yang; Sang-Won Park; Hyun-Pil Lim
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 1.904

3.  Bond strength of self-adhesive resin cement to base metal alloys having different surface treatments.

Authors:  Farhad Shafiei; Marjan Behroozibakhsh; Aref Abbasian; Samaneh Shahnavazi
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb

4.  Evaluation of Bond Strength between Grooved Titanium Alloy Implant Abutments and Provisional Veneering Materials after Surface Treatment of the Abutments: An In vitro Study.

Authors:  Gowtham Venkat; Murugesan Krishnan; Suganya Srinivasan; Muthukumar Balasubramanian
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep

5.  Shear bond strength of luting cements to fixed superstructure metal surfaces under various seating forces.

Authors:  Fusun Ozer; Elif Pak-Tunc; Nesrin Esen Dagli; Deepika Ramachandran; Deniz Sen; Markus Bernhard Blatz
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 1.904

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.