Comparison of two cochlear implant speech processors in better versus poorer performers.

The performance and subjective preferences for two different speech-processing strategies, the Speak strategy in the Cochlear Spectra 22 speech processor and the Multipeak (Mpeak) strategy in the Mini Speech Processor (MSP), are compared within two adult patient groups. Ten experienced cochlear implant (CI) users were selected for this study. One group of 5 CI users have significant open-set speech recognition, and the second group consisted of experienced CI users who have little or no open-set speech recognition on standardized tests (< 30% on sentence tests; < 10% on monosyllabic word tests). While only 4 of the 5 users in each group were available to complete this evaluation, suitable comparisons on the Speak and Mpeak strategies on test performance were possible within each patient group. The performance tests were necessarily different to suit each patient group; however, general trends of test scores and subjective evaluations of each speech processor are compared between these two groups. While the performance scores and subjective ratings consistently favored the Speak strategy in the first group of users, with good open-set speech recognition, the results within the second group were more variable. These findings have significant implications for individual patient and processor selection.