Literature DB >> 7668175

Use of double gloves to protect the surgeon from blood contact during aesthetic procedures.

R J Greco, J R Garza.   

Abstract

The potential for blood contact with nonintact skin puts operating room personnel at an increased risk of exposure to hepatitis or HIV virus. Frank needle-stick injury to the surgeon has been shown to occur once every 20-40 operations. It has been shown that blood contact exposure during aesthetic surgery occurs in 32% of the operations in which a single pair of surgical gloves is used (surgeon 39.7%, assistant 23%). The reduction of blood contact exposure during aesthetic surgical procedures by using two pairs of gloves was tested and demonstrated. Contact rates decreased by 70%. Outer-glove perforations occurred in 25.6% of the cases, while inner-glove perforations occurred in only 10% of the cases (surgeon 8.7%, assistant 3.5%). All of the inner-glove perforations occurred during procedures that lasted longer than two hours, and in no case was there an inner-glove defect without a corresponding outer-glove perforation. The nondominant index finger (33%) was the most common location. Double gloving during aesthetic procedures reduced the operating room personnel's risk of blood contact exposure by 70% when compared with single-glove use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7668175     DOI: 10.1007/bf00451102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg        ISSN: 0364-216X            Impact factor:   2.326


  10 in total

1.  Glove perforation in hand surgery.

Authors:  N Maffulli; V Testa; G Capasso
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 2.230

2.  Occult surgical glove perforations in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery.

Authors:  M S Godin; C J Lavernia; J P Harris
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1991-08

3.  Glove perforation in elective orthopedic surgery.

Authors:  N Maffulli; G Capasso; V Testa
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1989-10

4.  Efficacy of double versus single gloving in protecting the operating team.

Authors:  J S Gani; P F Anseline; R L Bissett
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1990-03

5.  Glove perforation during plastic surgery.

Authors:  R P Cole; D T Gault
Journal:  Br J Plast Surg       Date:  1989-07

6.  Surgical glove perforation.

Authors:  R D Dodds; P J Guy; A M Peacock; S R Duffy; S G Barker; M H Thomas
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Risk of blood contact through surgical gloves in aesthetic procedures.

Authors:  R J Greco; M Wheatley; P McKenna
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.326

8.  Efficacy of double-gloving as a barrier to microbial contamination during total joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  S F McCue; E W Berg; E A Saunders
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 9.  A surgeon's risk of AIDS.

Authors:  S J Schiff
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 5.115

10.  Double gloving. Protecting surgeons from blood contamination in the operating room.

Authors:  E J Quebbeman; G L Telford; K Wadsworth; S Hubbard; H Goodman; M S Gottlieb
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1992-02
  10 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Double gloving to reduce surgical cross-infection.

Authors:  J Tanner; H Parkinson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-07-19

2.  Knowledge, attitude, and practices related to standard precautions of surgeons and physicians in university-affiliated hospitals of Shiraz, Iran.

Authors:  Mehrdad Askarian; Mary-Louise McLaws; Marysia Meylan
Journal:  Int J Infect Dis       Date:  2006-07-11       Impact factor: 3.623

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.