Literature DB >> 7667493

Registration of colorectal cancer in Scotland: an assessment of data accuracy based on review of medical records.

D Brewster1, C Muir, J Crichton.   

Abstract

Colorectal cancer accounts for a substantial burden of morbidity and mortality in the population. While the need for reliable incidence data may be self-evident, the quality of cancer registration data has rarely been assessed. In Scotland during 1993, the medical records of a random sample of cancer registrations attributed to the year 1990 were sought. The sample contained 238 registrations of colorectal cancer, 217 (91%) of which had relevant medical records available for review. Registration details were reabstracted from available records and compared with data in the registry. Discrepancies in identifying items of data (surname, forename, sex and date of birth) were recorded in eight cases (3.7%, 95% confidence intervals 1.2-6.2%). None would have disturbed record linkage. Discrepancy rates of 3.7% (1.2-6.3%) in postcode of residence at the time of diagnosis (excluding differences arising through boundary changes), 8.3% (4.6-12.0%) in 'anniversary date' (excluding differences of 30 days or less), 2.8% (0.6-5.0%) in histological verification status and 13.5% (8.9-18.1%) in morphology code (excluding 'inferred' morphology codes) were recorded. Twelve cases (5.5%, 2.5-8.6%) were deemed not to warrant site codes for cancer of the colon (ICD-9 153) or rectum (ICD-9 154). In many respects, therefore, the data held about registrations of colorectal cancer in Scotland appear to show a high level of accuracy. Completeness of case ascertainment has still to be formally assessed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7667493     DOI: 10.1016/s0033-3506(95)80206-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health        ISSN: 0033-3506            Impact factor:   2.427


  5 in total

1.  Tumor registry versus physician medical record review: a direct comparison of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Elisabet E Manasanch; Jillian K Smith; Andreea Bodnari; Jeannine McKinney; Catherine Gray; Theodore P McDade; Jennifer F Tseng
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.840

2.  Accuracy of reporting of family history of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  R J Mitchell; D Brewster; H Campbell; M E M Porteous; A H Wyllie; C C Bird; M G Dunlop
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  The impact of socio-economic circumstances on overall and grade-specific prostate cancer incidence: a population-based study.

Authors:  K Shafique; R Oliphant; D S Morrison
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 7.640

4.  The changing association between socioeconomic circumstances and the incidence of colorectal cancer: a population-based study.

Authors:  R Oliphant; D H Brewster; D S Morrison
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Second primary cancer risk - the impact of applying different definitions of multiple primaries: results from a retrospective population-based cancer registry study.

Authors:  Aishah Coyte; David S Morrison; Philip McLoone
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 4.430

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.