Literature DB >> 7667491

Non-response in a population study after an environmental disaster.

K Foster1, D Campbell, J Crum, M Stove.   

Abstract

After the grounding of the tanker MV Braer off the coast of Shetland an epidemiological study was rapidly instigated to determine any immediate or long-term health effects on the exposed resident population. The study was carried out in two phases, at the time of the grounding and five months later. The objective of this study is to determine the reasons for non-response in both phases of the Shetland Health Study. A telephone survey was performed on a systematic sample of non-responders from the exposed population in both phases of the study. The setting was the south mainland of Shetland. Fifty-nine of the 215 non-responders in the first phase of the study and 16 of the 86 non-responders in the second phase were surveyed. The main reasons for non-response were attitudinal rather than situational or organisational. Non-responders did not feel their health was affected, were not interested in the study or did not think the study was useful. Some were put off by the biological tests involved and some had difficulties with appointment times. Practical issues such as flexible appointment systems are easier to address than client characteristics but factors relating to distrust and indifference must be addressed if non-response rates are to be minimised.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7667491     DOI: 10.1016/s0033-3506(95)80204-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health        ISSN: 0033-3506            Impact factor:   2.427


  6 in total

1.  A population comparison of participants and nonparticipants in a health survey.

Authors:  R C Klesges; J E Williamson; G W Somes; G W Talcott; H A Lando; C K Haddock
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Non-response and related factors in a nation-wide health survey.

Authors:  K Korkeila; S Suominen; J Ahvenainen; A Ojanlatva; P Rautava; H Helenius; M Koskenvuo
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  Comparison of participants and non-participants to the ORISCAV-LUX population-based study on cardiovascular risk factors in Luxembourg.

Authors:  Ala'a Alkerwi; Nicolas Sauvageot; Sophie Couffignal; Adelin Albert; Marie-Lise Lair; Michèle Guillaume
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  Hebei spirit oil spill exposure and subjective symptoms in residents participating in clean-up activities.

Authors:  Hae-Kwan Cheong; Mina Ha; Jong Seong Lee; Hojang Kwon; Eun-Hee Ha; Yun-Chul Hong; Yeyong Choi; Woo-Chul Jeong; Jongil Hur; Seung-Min Lee; Eun-Jung Kim; Hosub Im
Journal:  Environ Health Toxicol       Date:  2011-05-23

5.  Non-response in a nationwide follow-up postal survey in Finland: a register-based mortality analysis of respondents and non-respondents of the Health and Social Support (HeSSup) Study.

Authors:  Sakari Suominen; Karoliina Koskenvuo; Lauri Sillanmäki; Jussi Vahtera; Katariina Korkeila; Mika Kivimäki; Kari J Mattila; Pekka Virtanen; Markku Sumanen; Päivi Rautava; Markku Koskenvuo
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Epidemiological study air disaster in Amsterdam (ESADA): study design.

Authors:  Pauline Slottje; Anja C Huizink; Jos W R Twisk; Anke B Witteveen; Henk M van der Ploeg; Inge Bramsen; Nynke Smidt; Joost A Bijlsma; Lex M Bouter; Willem van Mechelen; Tjabe Smid
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2005-05-30       Impact factor: 3.295

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.