Literature DB >> 7666094

Randomized trial of interferon maintenance in multiple myeloma: a study of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group.

G P Browman1, D Bergsagel, D Sicheri, S O'Reilly, K S Wilson, S Rubin, A Belch, C Shustik, R Barr, I Walker.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether interferon maintenance therapy improves overall survival and response duration in patients with multiple myeloma who have responded to induction therapy with melphalan and prednisone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a multicenter trial, patients with symptomatic clinical stage I and stage II and III multiple myeloma were registered at diagnosis and those who responded to melphalan-prednisone (MP) were randomized either to receive interferon (2 mU/m2) subcutaneously three times per week or no maintenance. MP was discontinued in both groups once a stable response plateau of the monoclonal protein was reached. Interferon was continued until relapse, and then was restarted on subsequent response to MP. Interferon toxicity was recorded using a self-report diary. Survival and response duration were calculated using life-table methods, and were adjusted in the analysis for imbalances in baseline prognostic factors.
RESULTS: Four hundred two patients were registered and 176 responders were randomized (85 to interferon and 91 to control). At a median follow-up time of 43 months, the median survival duration was 43 months for interferon and 35 months for control (P = .16), but when adjusted for chance imbalances in baseline prognostic factors (mainly performance status), the median survival duration was 44 months and 33 months for interferon and control, respectively (P = .049). Progression-free survival from randomization to first relapse also favored interferon (unadjusted P < .002; adjusted P < .003). Interferon toxicity caused 58% of patients to reduce their dose, of which 84% were able to return to the initial dose; 14% had to discontinue interferon treatment.
CONCLUSION: Interferon maintenance therapy improves progression-free and overall survival of patients with multiple myeloma who respond to melphalan and prednisone. Toxicity is substantial and must be weighed by patients against the potential benefits in response duration and survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7666094     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1995.13.9.2354

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  14 in total

Review 1.  Treatment of multiple myeloma in elderly patients. New developments.

Authors:  G J Ossenkoppele
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 2.  Multiple myeloma.

Authors:  S Vincent Rajkumar
Journal:  Curr Probl Cancer       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.187

Review 3.  [Oncology '96].

Authors:  F Hartmann; M Pfreundschuh
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  1997-02-15

Review 4.  Therapeutic options in the treatment of multiple myeloma: pharmacoeconomic and quality-of-life considerations.

Authors:  F Wisløff; N Gulbrandsen; E Nord
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Viewpoint on the impact of interferon in the treatment of multiple myeloma: benefit for a small proportion of patients?

Authors:  J Bladé; J Esteve
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.064

6.  Cost-utility analysis of melphalan plus prednisone with or without interferon-alpha 2b in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Results from a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  E Nord; F Wisløff; M Hjorth; J Westin
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 7.  Current drug therapy for multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Y W Huang; A Hamilton; O J Arnuk; P Chaftari; R Chemaly
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Differential human multiple myeloma cell line responsiveness to interferon-alpha. Analysis of transcription factor activation and interleukin 6 receptor expression.

Authors:  D F Jelinek; K M Aagaard-Tillery; B K Arendt; T Arora; R C Tschumper; J J Westendorf
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1997-02-01       Impact factor: 14.808

9.  Phase II study of interleukin-12 for treatment of plateau phase multiple myeloma (E1A96): a trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

Authors:  Martha Q Lacy; Susanna Jacobus; Emily A Blood; Neil E Kay; S Vincent Rajkumar; Philip R Greipp
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 3.156

10.  Multiple Myeloma, Version 2.2016: Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

Authors:  Kenneth C Anderson; Melissa Alsina; Djordje Atanackovic; J Sybil Biermann; Jason C Chandler; Caitlin Costello; Benjamin Djulbegovic; Henry C Fung; Cristina Gasparetto; Kelly Godby; Craig Hofmeister; Leona Holmberg; Sarah Holstein; Carol Ann Huff; Adetola Kassim; Amrita Y Krishnan; Shaji K Kumar; Michaela Liedtke; Matthew Lunning; Noopur Raje; Seema Singhal; Clayton Smith; George Somlo; Keith Stockerl-Goldstein; Steven P Treon; Donna Weber; Joachim Yahalom; Dorothy A Shead; Rashmi Kumar
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 11.908

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.