Literature DB >> 7664551

Intraoperative end-tidal carbon dioxide values and derived calculations correlated with outcome: prognosis and capnography.

M Domsky1, R F Wilson, J Heins.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine how much information concerning resuscitation and outcome is provided by the end-tidal CO2 and derived variables obtained during surgery.
DESIGN: Retrospective chart review.
SETTING: Emergency hospital operating room. PATIENTS: One hundred critically ill or injured patients requiring major surgery and having a mortality rate of 41%.
INTERVENTIONS: Standard intraoperative monitoring, including continuous capnography, plus arterial blood gas analyses every 1 to 1.5 hrs during surgery.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There was only a fair correlation between the PaCO2 and end-tidal CO2 (r2 = .14). The mortality rates in these patients were highest in those patients who had the lowest end-tidal CO2 values, the highest arterial to end-tidal CO2 differences, and the highest estimated alveolar deadspace fraction. A persistent end-tidal CO2 of < or = 28 torr (< or = 3.8 kPa) was associated with a mortality rate of 55% (vs. 17% in those patients with a higher end-tidal CO2). The mortality rate was also increased in patients with a persistent arterial to end-tidal CO2 difference of > or = 8 torr (> or = 1.1 kPa) (58% vs. 23%).
CONCLUSIONS: End-tidal CO2 and derived values should be monitored closely in critically ill or injured patients. Efforts should be made--by increasing cardiac output and core temperature and by adjusting ventilation as needed--to maintain the end-tidal CO2 at > or = 29 torr (> or = 3.9 kPa) and the arterial to end-tidal CO2 difference at < or = 7 torr (< or = 1.0 kPa).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7664551     DOI: 10.1097/00003246-199509000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  8 in total

1.  End-tidal CO₂ detection of an audible heart rate during neonatal cardiopulmonary resuscitation after asystole in asphyxiated piglets.

Authors:  Lina F Chalak; Chad A Barber; Linda Hynan; Damian Garcia; Lucy Christie; Myra H Wyckoff
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.756

2.  The partial pressure of resting end-tidal carbon dioxide predicts major cardiac events in patients with systolic heart failure.

Authors:  Ross Arena; Jonathan Myers; Joshua Abella; Sherry Pinkstaff; Peter Brubaker; Brian Moore; Dalane Kitzman; Mary Ann Peberdy; Daniel Bensimhon; Paul Chase; Marco Guazzi
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 4.749

3.  The use of end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring in patients with hypotension in the emergency department.

Authors:  Cheah P Kheng; Nik H Rahman
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2012-07-24

Review 4.  Carbon dioxide kinetics and capnography during critical care.

Authors:  C T Anderson; P H Breen
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2000-07-12       Impact factor: 9.097

5.  Comparing Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Scores to End-tidal Carbon Dioxide as Mortality Predictors in Prehospital Patients with Suspected Sepsis.

Authors:  Christopher L Hunter; Salvatore Silvestri; George Ralls; Amanda Stone; Ayanna Walker; Neal Mangalat; Linda Papa
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2018-03-13

6.  Difference between arterial and end-tidal carbon dioxide and adverse events after non-cardiac surgery: a historical cohort study.

Authors:  Ryan Davis; Elizabeth Jewell; Milo Engoren; Michael Maile
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 7.  Current methodological and technical limitations of time and volumetric capnography in newborns.

Authors:  Gerd Schmalisch
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 2.819

8.  Exhaled CO2 Parameters as a Tool to Assess Ventilation-Perfusion Mismatching during Neonatal Resuscitation in a Swine Model of Neonatal Asphyxia.

Authors:  Elliott Shang-shun Li; Po-Yin Cheung; Megan O'Reilly; Joseph LaBossiere; Tze-Fun Lee; Shaun Cowan; David L Bigam; Georg Marcus Schmölzer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.