BACKGROUND: Hyperlipoproteinemia is associated with impairment of nitric oxide (NO)-mediated, endothelium-dependent dilation in renal arteries. In the present study, we assessed and compared the effects of human lipoprotein(a) and LDL on endothelium-dependent and -independent dilation in vitro. METHODS AND RESULTS: Dilator responses were detected in isolated, saline-perfused, preconstricted arterial segments by a photoelectric device. Acetylcholine-induced, endothelium-dependent dilator responses of rabbit renal arteries were not significantly attenuated after 150 minutes of incubation with native lipoprotein(a) (30 and 100 micrograms/mL). However, exposure to in vitro oxidized lipoprotein(a) (150 minutes, 30 and 100 micrograms/mL) suppressed acetylcholine-induced dilator responses in a dose-dependent manner. At similar concentrations, native and oxidized LDL had no effect. Endothelium-independent dilations induced by the NO-donor sodium nitroprusside were also impaired by oxidized lipoprotein(a), whereas forskolin-induced dilator responses were unaffected, indicating that smooth muscle dilator capacity was not impaired. Attenuation of dilator responses by oxidized lipoprotein(a) was potentiated in the presence of superoxide dismutase (SOD). The SOD effect was completely blunted by coincubation with catalase (100 U/mL) or deferoxamine. In the absence of SOD, catalase or deferoxamine had no effect on dilator responses. Using a chemiluminescence assay, we could detect increased O2- production by arteries pretreated with oxidized lipoprotein(a), which suggested that enhanced NO inactivation by O2- could be the underlying mechanism for impairment of endothelium-dependent dilations. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that oxidized lipoprotein(a) impairs endothelium-dependent dilation and is more potent than oxidized LDL in this effect. The mechanism of the impairment may involve formation of O2- and inactivation of NO.
BACKGROUND:Hyperlipoproteinemia is associated with impairment of nitric oxide (NO)-mediated, endothelium-dependent dilation in renal arteries. In the present study, we assessed and compared the effects of human lipoprotein(a) and LDL on endothelium-dependent and -independent dilation in vitro. METHODS AND RESULTS: Dilator responses were detected in isolated, saline-perfused, preconstricted arterial segments by a photoelectric device. Acetylcholine-induced, endothelium-dependent dilator responses of rabbit renal arteries were not significantly attenuated after 150 minutes of incubation with native lipoprotein(a) (30 and 100 micrograms/mL). However, exposure to in vitro oxidized lipoprotein(a) (150 minutes, 30 and 100 micrograms/mL) suppressed acetylcholine-induced dilator responses in a dose-dependent manner. At similar concentrations, native and oxidized LDL had no effect. Endothelium-independent dilations induced by the NO-donorsodium nitroprusside were also impaired by oxidized lipoprotein(a), whereas forskolin-induced dilator responses were unaffected, indicating that smooth muscle dilator capacity was not impaired. Attenuation of dilator responses by oxidized lipoprotein(a) was potentiated in the presence of superoxide dismutase (SOD). The SOD effect was completely blunted by coincubation with catalase (100 U/mL) or deferoxamine. In the absence of SOD, catalase or deferoxamine had no effect on dilator responses. Using a chemiluminescence assay, we could detect increased O2- production by arteries pretreated with oxidized lipoprotein(a), which suggested that enhanced NO inactivation by O2- could be the underlying mechanism for impairment of endothelium-dependent dilations. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that oxidized lipoprotein(a) impairs endothelium-dependent dilation and is more potent than oxidized LDL in this effect. The mechanism of the impairment may involve formation of O2- and inactivation of NO.
Authors: P Clarkson; M R Adams; A J Powe; A E Donald; R McCredie; J Robinson; S N McCarthy; A Keech; D S Celermajer; J E Deanfield Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 1996-04-15 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Ruben Miguel Ayzin Rosoky; Nelson Wolosker; Michel Nasser; Antonio Eduardo Zerati; Magnus Gidlund; Pedro Puech-Leão Journal: Clinics (Sao Paulo) Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 2.365
Authors: Deepesh Pandey; Anil Bhunia; Young Jun Oh; Fumin Chang; Yehudit Bergman; Jae Hyung Kim; Janna Serbo; Tatiana N Boronina; Robert N Cole; Jennifer Van Eyk; Alan T Remaley; Dan E Berkowitz; Lewis H Romer Journal: Circ Res Date: 2014-06-05 Impact factor: 17.367