Literature DB >> 7664415

Intracoronary radiation before stent implantation inhibits neointima formation in stented porcine coronary arteries.

R Waksman1, K A Robinson, I R Crocker, M B Gravanis, S J Palmer, C Wang, G D Cipolla, S B King.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Stent implantation has been shown to reduce restenosis by establishing a larger lumen but not by reducing neointima formation. We have previously shown that ionizing radiation reduced neointima formation after balloon injury in a swine model of restenosis. The purpose of this study was to determine whether endovascular irradiation of the coronary artery before stent implantation would affect neointima formation. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Nine normolipemic pigs underwent coronary angiography, and segments of the left anterior descending and left circumflex arteries were chosen as targets for stenting. A high-activity 192Ir source was used to deliver 14 Gy by random assignment to one of the vessels. After this, 3.5-mm tantalum stents were implanted in both arteries. Three additional pigs were treated with a 90Sr/Y source (a pure beta-emitter) delivering 14 Gy to five segments of coronary vessels that were stented immediately after irradiation. Stent-to-artery ratio was similar in the radiated and the control arteries. Animals received aspirin 325 mg daily and were killed at 28 days. The intimal area was significantly reduced in the irradiated stented arteries compared with control arteries treated with stent only (1.98 mm2 with 192Ir and 2.53 mm2 with 90Sr/Y versus 3.82 mm2 in the control stented arteries, P < .005).
CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular radiation before coronary stenting reduces neointima formation and may further reduce the restenosis rate after stent implantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7664415     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.92.6.1383

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  10 in total

1.  Intravascular radiation for restenosis prevention: could it be the holy grail?

Authors:  S B King
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  Dealing with in-stent restenosis.

Authors:  A H Gershlick; J Baron
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 3.  The radioisotope stent for the prevention of restenosis.

Authors:  T A Fischell; C Hehrlein
Journal:  Herz       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 4.  Intracoronary brachytherapy in the Cath Lab. Physics dosimetry, technology and safety considerations.

Authors:  R Waksman
Journal:  Herz       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 5.  Endovascular brachytherapy--treatment planning and radiation protection.

Authors:  U Quast; D Flühs; M Bambynek
Journal:  Herz       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 1.443

6.  Some thoughts on the present and future of coronary artery stenting.

Authors:  P J De Feyter; P N Ruygrok; P Mills
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 7.  Endovascular stents: a 'break through technology', future challenges.

Authors:  A G Violaris; Y Ozaki; P W Serruys
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1997-02

Review 8.  [Intravascular irradiation in the combined therapy and prevention of restenosis. Overview].

Authors:  D Baumgart; U Quast; R Erbel
Journal:  Herz       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 1.443

9.  Intrastent sonotherapy in pulmonary vein restenosis: a new treatment for a recalcitrant problem.

Authors:  C J McMahon; C E Mullins; H G El Said
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.994

10.  Verification and uniformity control of doses for Sr/Y intravascular brachytherapy sources using radiochromic film dosimetry.

Authors:  Bayram Demir; Asm Sabbir Ahmed; Erhan Babalik; Mustafa Demir; Tevfik Gürmen
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2008-04
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.