Literature DB >> 7664012

Colour flow duplex scanning in suspected acute deep vein thrombosis; experience with routine use.

N Labropoulos1, M Leon, E Kalodiki, A al Kutoubi, P Chan, A N Nicolaides.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the accuracy of colour flow Duplex scanning (CFDS) in the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and subsequently to investigate its diagnostic value in patients who have normal deep veins despite symptoms.
DESIGN: Prospective open clinical study.
SETTING: Vascular laboratory and radiology departments of University Hospital.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the first part 112 limbs in 103 patients, 94 with symptoms of acute DVT and nine with pulmonary embolism (PE) were examined prospectively with CFDS and venography. Subsequently, in the second part, 328 legs in 304 patients were examined by CFDS alone for acute symptoms of DVT or PE. MAIN
RESULTS: DVT was detected in 55 limbs by venography: proximal DVT was seen in 23 limbs, distal DVT in 25 limbs and both proximal and distal in seven limbs. CFDS was 100% sensitive and 98.8% specific in detecting proximal DVT whereas its sensitivity and specificity was 87.5% and 98.7% for distal DVT. Positive and negative predictive values were over 95% for both limb segments. The overall accuracy for the proximal DVT was 99.4% and for the distal 93.1%. In the second part, CFDS alone detected DVT in 156 limbs (47.6%); DVT was in the proximal segment in 82, distal segment in 61 and both in 13. In 172 limbs other causes of symptoms were identified in 34 (20%).
CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated that CFDS is as accurate as venography when used by experienced operators. The average time of examination is 15-20 minutes and compares favourably with venography. Other causes of leg symptoms can also be diagnosed by CFDS in around 20% of patients who are found to have normal veins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7664012     DOI: 10.1016/s1078-5884(05)80224-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg        ISSN: 1078-5884            Impact factor:   7.069


  5 in total

Review 1.  Suspected deep vein thrombosis: a management algorithm for the accident and emergency department.

Authors:  S Nawaz; P Chan; S Ireland
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1999-11

2.  Diagnosis of DVT: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Shannon M Bates; Roman Jaeschke; Scott M Stevens; Steven Goodacre; Philip S Wells; Matthew D Stevenson; Clive Kearon; Holger J Schunemann; Mark Crowther; Stephen G Pauker; Regina Makdissi; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

3.  An algorithm for the investigation and management of patients with suspected deep venous thrombosis at a district general hospital.

Authors:  K Walsh; N Kelaher; K Long; P Cervi
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.401

4.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography for deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Steve Goodacre; Fiona Sampson; Steve Thomas; Edwin van Beek; Alex Sutton
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2005-10-03       Impact factor: 1.930

5.  Early experience using duplex ultrasonography in the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis; a prospective evaluation.

Authors:  P T Kennedy; W Loan; M Buckley; P Rice; P Hanley
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  1999-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.