Literature DB >> 7663891

Scopolamine impairs acquisition and facilitates consolidation of fear conditioning: differential effects for tone vs context conditioning.

S L Young1, D L Bohenek, M S Fanselow.   

Abstract

Cholinergic antagonism impacts selected learning tasks. To understand where scopolamine exerts its action, learning tasks differentially sensitive to hippocampus and amygdala lesions were used. Hippocampal lesions prevent context fear conditioning without effect on tone conditioning. These lesions also produce a time-dependent retrograde deficit in context conditioning. The amygdala is necessary for both tone and context conditioning. To examine the possibility that cholinergic antagonism mimics hippocampal damage or amygdala damage, rats were given scopolamine (1 mg/kg) either before or after fear conditioning. In the fear conditioning procedure, rats received tone-footshock or context-footshock pairings. Evidence of conditioning to the tone and the context was provided by observation of freezing. When given prior to training, scopolamine blocked fear conditioning to the tone in a dose-dependent fashion but had no effect on context conditioning. The impairment of tone conditioning did not occur with methylscopolamine, indicating the central action of the drug. Rats given scopolamine immediately following fear conditioning, tested later in a drug-free state, froze more to the tone than rats given a control injection. The effect of scopolamine on freezing to the context was not reliable. The present results suggest that scopolamine's impact on fear conditioning is mediated by some mechanism other than impaired hippocampal or amygdala functioning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7663891     DOI: 10.1006/nlme.1995.1018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem        ISSN: 1074-7427            Impact factor:   2.877


  16 in total

1.  Effects of the selective M1 muscarinic receptor antagonist dicyclomine on emotional memory.

Authors:  R V Fornari; K M Moreira; M G Oliveira
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.460

Review 2.  Neuromodulation by glutamate and acetylcholine can change circuit dynamics by regulating the relative influence of afferent input and excitatory feedback.

Authors:  Lisa M Giocomo; Michael E Hasselmo
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 5.590

3.  Levels of neurotrophic factors in the hippocampus and amygdala correlate with anxiety- and fear-related behaviour in C57BL6 mice.

Authors:  B K Yee; S-W Zhu; A H Mohammed; J Feldon
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2006-08-08       Impact factor: 3.575

4.  M3 muscarinic receptor in the ventral medial prefrontal cortex modulating the expression of contextual fear conditioning in rats.

Authors:  A G Fedoce; N C Ferreira-Junior; D G Reis; F M A Corrêa; L B M Resstel
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2015-10-31       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 5.  Cholinergic regulation of fear learning and extinction.

Authors:  Marlene A Wilson; Jim R Fadel
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 4.164

6.  Impaired contextual fear-conditioning in MAM rodent model of schizophrenia.

Authors:  Kathryn M Gill; Sarah A Miller; Anthony A Grace
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Effects of muscarinic receptor antagonism in the basolateral amygdala on two-way active avoidance.

Authors:  Anna Carballo-Márquez; Pere Boadas-Vaello; Irene Villarejo-Rodríguez; Gemma Guillazo-Blanch; Margarita Martí-Nicolovius; Anna Vale-Martínez
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Cholinergic modulation during acquisition of olfactory fear conditioning alters learning and stimulus generalization in mice.

Authors:  Eloisa Pavesi; Allison Gooch; Elizabeth Lee; Max L Fletcher
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 2.460

9.  Selective activation of the M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor achieved by allosteric potentiation.

Authors:  Lei Ma; Matthew A Seager; Matthew Seager; Marion Wittmann; Marlene Jacobson; Denise Bickel; Maryann Burno; Keith Jones; Valerie Kuzmick Graufelds; Guangping Xu; Michelle Pearson; Alexander McCampbell; Renee Gaspar; Paul Shughrue; Andrew Danziger; Christopher Regan; Rose Flick; Danette Pascarella; Susan Garson; Scott Doran; Constantine Kreatsoulas; Lone Veng; Craig W Lindsley; William Shipe; Scott Kuduk; Cyrille Sur; Gene Kinney; Guy R Seabrook; William J Ray
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Modulation of neuronal microcircuit activities within the medial prefrontal cortex by mGluR5 positive allosteric modulator.

Authors:  Marie Pollard; Jose Manuel Bartolome; P Jeffrey Conn; Thomas Steckler; Hamdy Shaban
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 4.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.