Literature DB >> 7663591

Moral distress of critical care nurses.

M C Corley1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Constraint of nurses by healthcare organizations, from actions the nurses believe are appropriate, may lead to moral distress.
OBJECTIVE: To present findings on moral distress of critical care nurses, using an investigator-developed instrument.
METHODS: An instrument development design using consensus by three expert judges, test-retest reliability, and factor analysis was used. Study participants (N = 111) were members of a chapter of the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses, critical care nurses employed in a large medical center, and critical care nurses from a private hospital. A 32-item instrument included items on prolonging life, performing unnecessary tests and treatments, lying to patients, and incompetent or inadequate treatment by physicians.
RESULTS: Three factors were identified using factor analysis after expert consensus on the items: aggressive care, honesty, and action response. Nurses in the private hospital reported significantly greater moral distress on the aggressive care factor than did nurses in the medical center. Nurses not working in intensive care experienced higher levels of moral distress on the aggressive care factor than did nurses working in intensive care. Of the 111 nurses, 12% had left a nursing position primarily because of moral distress.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the mean scores showed somewhat low levels of moral distress, the range of responses revealed that some nurses experienced high levels of moral distress with the issues. Research is needed on conditions organizations must provide to support the moral integrity of critical care nurses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioethics and Professional Ethics; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7663591

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Crit Care        ISSN: 1062-3264            Impact factor:   2.228


  24 in total

1.  Empirical research on moral distress: issues, challenges, and opportunities.

Authors:  Ann B Hamric
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2012-03

Review 2.  Justified use of painful stimuli in the coma examination: a neurologic and ethical rationale.

Authors:  Michael A Williams; Cynda H Rushton
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2009-03-07       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 3.  Bioethics for clinicians: 16. Dealing with demands for inappropriate treatment.

Authors:  C Weijer; P A Singer; B M Dickens; S Workman
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-10-06       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Moral distress, moral residue, and the crescendo effect.

Authors:  Elizabeth Gingell Epstein; Ann Baile Hamric
Journal:  J Clin Ethics       Date:  2009

5.  Moral Distress During COVID-19: Residents in Training Are at High Risk.

Authors:  Breanne Jacobs; Rita A Manfredi
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2020-07-20

6.  Addressing 21st-century nursing ethics: implications for critical care nurses.

Authors:  Cynda Hylton Rushton; Karen Stutzer
Journal:  AACN Adv Crit Care       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

7.  The Standard Account of Moral Distress and Why We Should Keep It.

Authors:  Joan McCarthy; Settimio Monteverde
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2018-12

8.  Moral obligations of nurses and physicians in neonatal end-of-life care.

Authors:  Elizabeth Gingell Epstein
Journal:  Nurs Ethics       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.874

9.  End-of-life experiences of nurses and physicians in the newborn intensive care unit.

Authors:  E G Epstein
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2008-07-03       Impact factor: 2.521

10.  Development process and initial validation of the Ethical Conflict in Nursing Questionnaire-Critical Care Version.

Authors:  Anna Falcó-Pegueroles; Teresa Lluch-Canut; Joan Guàrdia-Olmos
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 2.652

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.