Literature DB >> 7662394

Who plans to be tested for HIV or would get tested if no one could find out the results?

K A Phillips1, T J Coates, R B Eversley, J A Catania.   

Abstract

We analyzed the characteristics of individuals at risk for HIV who have not been tested but who (1) planned to be tested, or (2) would get tested "if no one other than you (the respondent) could find out your results." Data were from the 1991 National AIDS Behavioral Surveys, a probability sample of the U.S. population. Logistic regression was used to analyze the correlates of testing behavior among the 41% of individuals in high-prevalence cities who had HIV risk factors (n = 3,175). Of this group, 7% planned to be tested and 30% would get tested "if no one other than you could find out the results." Minorities and individuals with less education and without insurance were more likely to plan to be tested (versus previously tested), and individuals with less education and lower incomes were more likely to be willing to be tested "if no one other than you could find out the results" (versus previously tested). We conclude that a variety of options to increase testing rates should be explored, including accessible testing services, policies and procedures to increase perceptions of testing privacy, and home testing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7662394

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  6 in total

1.  Measuring preferences for health care interventions using conjoint analysis: an application to HIV testing.

Authors:  Kathryn A Phillips; Tara Maddala; F Reed Johnson
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  A qualitative study of women's views on medical confidentiality.

Authors:  G Jenkins; J F Merz; P Sankar
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Counseling and testing for HIV prevention: costs, effects, and cost-effectiveness of more rapid screening tests.

Authors:  P G Farnham; R D Gorsky; D R Holtgrave; W K Jones; M E Guinan
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 4.  Patient perspectives of medical confidentiality: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Pamela Sankar; Susan Mora; Jon F Merz; Nora L Jones
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Prevalence of the use of cancer related self-tests by members of the public: a community survey.

Authors:  Sue Wilson; Sheila Greenfield; Helen M Pattison; Angela Ryan; Richard J McManus; David Fitzmaurice; John Marriott; Cyril Chapman; Sue Clifford
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2006-08-25       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Self-testing for cancer: a community survey.

Authors:  Sue Wilson; Angela V Ryan; Sheila M Greenfield; Sue C Clifford; Roger L Holder; Helen M Pattison; David A Fitzmaurice; Richard J McManus
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2008-04-14       Impact factor: 4.430

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.