Literature DB >> 7662244

Prevalence of white coat effect in treated hypertensive patients in the community.

M G Myers1, P I Oh, R A Reeves, C D Joyner.   

Abstract

Patients receiving drug therapy for hypertension in the tertiary care setting frequently exhibit higher office readings compared to ambulatory blood pressure values (white coat effect). In this study, the prevalence of a white coat effect was determined in an unselected population of 147 hypertensive patients receiving treatment from their family physicians in the community. The proportion of patients with a white coat effect (defined as office - ambulatory blood pressure > or = 20/10 mm Hg) was significantly (P < .001) higher when based upon the family physician's routine blood pressure readings (91/147), compared to special readings taken by the family physician for the study (54/147) or readings taken by a research nurse (30/147). There was a higher correlation (P < .05) between the ambulatory systolic blood pressure and the nurse's readings (r = 0.62) or special physician's readings (r = 0.55) v the routine physician's readings (r = 0.34). Left ventricular mass index as measured by echocardiography correlated (P < .01) with the special physician (r = 0.27), nurse (r = 0.23), and ambulatory systolic blood pressure readings (r = 0.24), but not with the routine physician's readings (r = 0.06). A white coat effect is frequently present in treated hypertensive patients when blood pressure is recorded by family physicians in routine clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7662244     DOI: 10.1016/0895-7061(95)00049-U

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hypertens        ISSN: 0895-7061            Impact factor:   2.689


  25 in total

1.  Diagnosis and treatment of high blood pressure. New directions and new approaches: 1999 Canadian recommendations for management of hypertension.

Authors:  R J Petrella
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Level of blood pressure above goal and clinical inertia in a Medicaid population.

Authors:  Anthony J Viera; Dorothee Schmid; Susan Bostrom; Angie Yow; William Lawrence; C Annette DuBard
Journal:  J Am Soc Hypertens       Date:  2010-08-21

Review 3.  Doctors record higher blood pressures than nurses: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Christopher E Clark; Isabella A Horvath; Rod S Taylor; John L Campbell
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Hypertension Canada's 2016 Canadian Hypertension Education Program guidelines for pharmacists: An update.

Authors:  Yazid N Al Hamarneh; Sherilyn K D Houle; Raj Padwal; Ross T Tsuyuki
Journal:  Can Pharm J (Ott)       Date:  2016-10-06

Review 5.  Clinical Implications of Different Blood Pressure Measurement Techniques.

Authors:  Paul Drawz
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 6.  Blood Pressure Assessment in Adults in Clinical Practice and Clinic-Based Research: JACC Scientific Expert Panel.

Authors:  Paul Muntner; Paula T Einhorn; William C Cushman; Paul K Whelton; Natalie A Bello; Paul E Drawz; Beverly B Green; Daniel W Jones; Stephen P Juraschek; Karen L Margolis; Edgar R Miller; Ann Marie Navar; Yechiam Ostchega; Michael K Rakotz; Bernard Rosner; Joseph E Schwartz; Daichi Shimbo; George S Stergiou; Raymond R Townsend; Jeff D Williamson; Jackson T Wright; Lawrence J Appel
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Clinical problem solving based on the 1999 Canadian recommendations for the management of hypertension.

Authors:  R D Feldman; N R Campbell; P Larochelle
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 8.  Automated office blood pressure measurement in primary care.

Authors:  Martin G Myers; Janusz Kaczorowski; Martin Dawes; Marshall Godwin
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 9.  Blood Pressure Goals in Patients with CKD: A Review of Evidence and Guidelines.

Authors:  Alex R Chang; Meghan Lóser; Rakesh Malhotra; Lawrence J Appel
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 8.237

10.  IMPPACT: Investigation of Medical Professionals and Patients Achieving Control Together.

Authors:  Sheldon W Tobe; Katie Hunter; Ryan Geerts; Nicholas Raymond; George Pylypchuk
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.