BACKGROUND AND DESIGN: There are no large studies evaluating patients with erythrodermic mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome to determine the important prognostic factors that may influence survival. This is important since new treatment modalities have been proposed as superior to existing primary therapies. We performed a retrospective cohort study of 106 patients with erythrodermic mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome, followed up in the Stanford (Calif) Mycosis Fungoides Clinic, to define the important prognostic factors in this group. RESULTS: Patients younger than 65 years have a more favorable survival profile than those 65 years or older (P < .005). Longer duration of symptoms before diagnosis ( > or = 10 years) tends to be associated with more favorable prognosis (p = .055). Lymph node stage is significantly correlated with survival; patients with overall stage III disease have more favorable prognosis than those with stage IV disease (P < .001). Patients with circulating Sézary cells in their blood have a significantly worse prognosis than those without (P < .005). Patient sex or race had no significant effect on overall survival outcome. Three distinct prognostic groups were identified, "favorable," "intermediate," and "unfavorable," according to the number of unfavorable prognostic factors (P < .005). The median survival in each group is 10.2, 3.7, and 1.5 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with erythrodermic mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome, the important prognostic factors are patient age at presentation, the overall stage, and peripheral blood involvement. Survival varies widely, depending on these variables. These prognostic factors should be evaluated when analyzing survival and/or treatment efficacy data of these patients.
BACKGROUND AND DESIGN: There are no large studies evaluating patients with erythrodermic mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome to determine the important prognostic factors that may influence survival. This is important since new treatment modalities have been proposed as superior to existing primary therapies. We performed a retrospective cohort study of 106 patients with erythrodermic mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome, followed up in the Stanford (Calif) Mycosis Fungoides Clinic, to define the important prognostic factors in this group. RESULTS:Patients younger than 65 years have a more favorable survival profile than those 65 years or older (P < .005). Longer duration of symptoms before diagnosis ( > or = 10 years) tends to be associated with more favorable prognosis (p = .055). Lymph node stage is significantly correlated with survival; patients with overall stage III disease have more favorable prognosis than those with stage IV disease (P < .001). Patients with circulating Sézary cells in their blood have a significantly worse prognosis than those without (P < .005). Patient sex or race had no significant effect on overall survival outcome. Three distinct prognostic groups were identified, "favorable," "intermediate," and "unfavorable," according to the number of unfavorable prognostic factors (P < .005). The median survival in each group is 10.2, 3.7, and 1.5 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with erythrodermic mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome, the important prognostic factors are patient age at presentation, the overall stage, and peripheral blood involvement. Survival varies widely, depending on these variables. These prognostic factors should be evaluated when analyzing survival and/or treatment efficacy data of these patients.
Authors: Michael Nebozhyn; Andrey Loboda; Laszlo Kari; Alain H Rook; Eric C Vonderheid; Stuart Lessin; Carole Berger; Richard Edelson; Calen Nichols; Malik Yousef; Lalitha Gudipati; Meiling Shang; Michael K Showe; Louise C Showe Journal: Blood Date: 2006-01-10 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: R Knobler; G Berlin; P Calzavara-Pinton; H Greinix; P Jaksch; L Laroche; J Ludvigsson; P Quaglino; W Reinisch; J Scarisbrick; T Schwarz; P Wolf; P Arenberger; C Assaf; M Bagot; M Barr; A Bohbot; L Bruckner-Tuderman; B Dreno; A Enk; L French; R Gniadecki; H Gollnick; M Hertl; C Jantschitsch; A Jung; U Just; C-D Klemke; U Lippert; T Luger; E Papadavid; H Pehamberger; A Ranki; R Stadler; W Sterry; I H Wolf; M Worm; J Zic; C C Zouboulis; U Hillen Journal: J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 6.166
Authors: Erica Ballabio; Tracey Mitchell; Marloes S van Kester; Stephen Taylor; Heather M Dunlop; Jianxiang Chi; Isabella Tosi; Maarten H Vermeer; Daniela Tramonti; Nigel J Saunders; Jacqueline Boultwood; James S Wainscoat; Francesco Pezzella; Sean J Whittaker; Cornelius P Tensen; Christian S R Hatton; Charles H Lawrie Journal: Blood Date: 2010-05-06 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Niko Escher; Martin Kaatz; Christian Melle; Christina Hipler; Mirjana Ziemer; Dominik Driesch; Uwe Wollina; Ferdinand von Eggeling Journal: Neoplasia Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 5.715
Authors: Antonieta Medina-Lara; Bogdan Grigore; Ruth Lewis; Jaime Peters; Sarah Price; Paolo Landa; Sophie Robinson; Richard Neal; William Hamilton; Anne E Spencer Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2020-11 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: Laszlo Kari; Andrey Loboda; Michael Nebozhyn; Alain H Rook; Eric C Vonderheid; Calen Nichols; Dezso Virok; Celia Chang; Wen-Hwai Horng; James Johnston; Maria Wysocka; Michael K Showe; Louise C Showe Journal: J Exp Med Date: 2003-06-02 Impact factor: 14.307