R E Engstrom1, G N Holland. 1. UCLA Ocular Inflammatory Disease Center, Jules Stein Eye Institute, 90095-7003, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We sought to understand better the efficacy and risks of local therapies (direct placement of drug into the eye) for the treatment of cytomegalovirus retinopathy. This understanding can be used to design rational treatment regimens, to formulate indications for use of local therapy, and to establish criteria for assessment of future results in this area. METHODS: We collected information about local therapies through a review of published literature. RESULTS: Intraocular injection of ganciclovir and foscarnet and implantation of intraocular devices that slowly release ganciclovir are able to decrease the activity of cytomegalovirus retinopathy lesions and prevent their enlargement for variable periods of time. The time to disease progression (lesion enlargement) may be longer with intraocular devices than with current treatments using intravenously administered antiviral drugs. Local therapies have many advantages (for example, convenience, reduced cost, and lack of systemic toxicity), but there are potential disadvantages, including endophthalmitis, increased rates of retinal detachment, and development of nonocular cytomegalovirus disease and cytomegalovirus retinopathy in fellow, uninvolved eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Local therapies are effective for the treatment of cytomegalovirus retinopathy, but their relative risks and benefits, when compared with those of intravenous drug therapy, have yet to be fully evaluated. We anticipate that local therapy will be an important treatment modality for selected patients with cytomegalovirus retinopathy. Indications include the use of local therapy as an alternative therapy for patients who are unable to receive systemic therapy (intolerance to intravenous or oral medication, or lack of intravenous access) and as supplementation in patients whose retinal disease is incompletely controlled by maximum tolerated systemic medications. The use of local therapy as sole initial treatment in lieu of systemic therapy remains controversial. Its most useful role may be in conjunction with oral forms of antiviral drugs now in development.
PURPOSE: We sought to understand better the efficacy and risks of local therapies (direct placement of drug into the eye) for the treatment of cytomegalovirus retinopathy. This understanding can be used to design rational treatment regimens, to formulate indications for use of local therapy, and to establish criteria for assessment of future results in this area. METHODS: We collected information about local therapies through a review of published literature. RESULTS: Intraocular injection of ganciclovir and foscarnet and implantation of intraocular devices that slowly release ganciclovir are able to decrease the activity of cytomegalovirus retinopathy lesions and prevent their enlargement for variable periods of time. The time to disease progression (lesion enlargement) may be longer with intraocular devices than with current treatments using intravenously administered antiviral drugs. Local therapies have many advantages (for example, convenience, reduced cost, and lack of systemic toxicity), but there are potential disadvantages, including endophthalmitis, increased rates of retinal detachment, and development of nonocular cytomegalovirus disease and cytomegalovirus retinopathy in fellow, uninvolved eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Local therapies are effective for the treatment of cytomegalovirus retinopathy, but their relative risks and benefits, when compared with those of intravenous drug therapy, have yet to be fully evaluated. We anticipate that local therapy will be an important treatment modality for selected patients with cytomegalovirus retinopathy. Indications include the use of local therapy as an alternative therapy for patients who are unable to receive systemic therapy (intolerance to intravenous or oral medication, or lack of intravenous access) and as supplementation in patients whose retinal disease is incompletely controlled by maximum tolerated systemic medications. The use of local therapy as sole initial treatment in lieu of systemic therapy remains controversial. Its most useful role may be in conjunction with oral forms of antiviral drugs now in development.
Authors: Michael Yen; Jenny Chen; Somsanguan Ausayakhun; Paradee Kunavisarut; Pornpattana Vichitvejpaisal; Sakarin Ausayakhun; Choeng Jirawison; Jessica Shantha; Gary N Holland; David Heiden; Todd P Margolis; Jeremy D Keenan Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2014-10-22 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Richard G Lalonde; Guy Boivin; Jean Deschênes; William G Hodge; J Jill Hopkins; Alex H Klein; Janette I Lindley; Peter Phillips; Stephen D Shafran; Sharon Walmsley Journal: Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 2.471