Literature DB >> 7661148

Bond strengths and remnant adhesive resin on debonding for orthodontic bonding techniques.

P K Sinha1, R S Nanda, M G Duncanson, M J Hosier.   

Abstract

Bond strengths and remnant adhesive resin on the tooth surface after debonding for three bonding techniques used to attach foil mesh orthodontic brackets to 315 freshly extracted bovine incisor teeth were compared in an in vitro study. Each method of bonding used 105 teeth in groups of 15, bonded with seven different (bis-GMA type) two-paste chemically cured resins. The direct method comprised bonding the attachments directly to the incisors with the composite resin. The indirect-1 method comprised securing attachments to die-stone models of the teeth with a water soluble glue, making silicone positioners to transfer the brackets from the models to the teeth, and bonding to the teeth with the use of the two-paste composite resin system. The indirect-2 method comprised bonding the attachments to die-stone models of the teeth with composite resin, making silicone positioners to transfer the brackets from the models to the teeth, and bonding to the teeth with the use of unfilled sealant resin. Significant differences in bond strength existed among the groups evaluated. The direct technique had statistically significant (p < 0.05) higher bond strength as compared with the indirect-1 and indirect-2 techniques in four of the seven groups evaluated. The indirect-1 and indirect-2 techniques were not significantly different (p < 0.05) in bond strength in six of seven groups tested. The indirect-2 technique had significantly lower adhesive remnant index scores (ARI) compared with the direct and indirect-1 techniques.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7661148     DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(95)70025-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  5 in total

1.  Shear bond strength of metal brackets to feldspathic porcelain treated by Nd:YAG laser and hydrofluoric acid.

Authors:  Mohammad Hashem Hosseini; Farhad Sobouti; Ardavan Etemadi; Nasim Chiniforush; Mahsa Shariati
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2013-10-19       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  Comparative efficacy of Er,Cr:YSGG and Er:YAG lasers for etching of composite for orthodontic bracket bonding.

Authors:  Amir Hossein Mirhashemi; Nasim Chiniforush; Nastaran Sharifi; Amir Mehdi Hosseini
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 3.161

3.  Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets Using Direct and Indirect Bonding Methods in Vitro and in Vivo.

Authors:  Kenan Demirovic; Martina Slaj; Stjepan Spalj; Mladen Slaj; Sedin Kobaslija
Journal:  Acta Inform Med       Date:  2018-06

4.  Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets Bonded to Enamel Prepared By Er:YAG Laser and Conventional Acid-Etching.

Authors:  M H Hosseini; F Namvar; J Chalipa; K Saber; N Chiniforush; S Sarmadi; A H Mirhashemi
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2012-03-31

5.  Evaluation of stresses developed in different bracket-cement-enamel systems using finite element analysis with in vitro bond strength tests.

Authors:  Shaymaa E Elsaka; Shaza M Hammad; Noha F Ibrahim
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 2.750

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.