Literature DB >> 7661142

Debonding orthodontic ceramic brackets by ultrasonic instrumentation.

D B Boyer1, G Engelhardt, S E Bishara.   

Abstract

Breakage of ceramic brackets because of brittleness may cause such problems as aspiration of fragments and injury by flying debris. Portions remaining on the tooth must be laboriously ground off with a handpiece. This study investigated a potential method of lowering the force required to remove ceramic brackets, i.e., use of an ultrasonic chisel. Ceramic brackets were bonded to extracted incisors and canines. The degree of cure of a light-activated cement was systematically varied with different exposure times to a curing light. The brackets were sheared from the teeth with a universal testing machine and a chisel tip on a Cavitron. The ultrasonic chisel markedly reduced the force required to debond the brackets; however, the time of application averaged 16.6 seconds. Reducing the degree of cure of the cement had only a slight effect on the time required and the forces generated. This method of debonding is not recommended without further development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7661142     DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(95)70019-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  9 in total

1.  CO2 laser debonding of a ceramic bracket bonded with orthodontic adhesive containing thermal expansion microcapsules.

Authors:  Ayano Saito; Yasuhiro Namura; Keitaro Isokawa; Noriyoshi Shimizu
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  Shear bond strength and enamel fracture behavior of ceramic brackets Fascination® and Fascination®2.

Authors:  Robert Gittner; Ralf Müller-Hartwich; Sylvia Engel; Paul-Georg Jost-Brinkmann
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2012-01-15       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Survey on awareness and preference of ceramic bracket debonding techniques among orthodontists.

Authors:  Aileen Y Ngan; Prashanti Bollu; Kishore Chaudhry; Richard Stevens; Karthikeyan Subramani
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2020-07-01

4.  Enamel Surface Damage following Debonding of Ceramic Brackets: A Hospital-Based Study.

Authors:  Neelutpal Bora; Putul Mahanta; Deepjyoti Kalita; Sangeeta Deka; Ranjumoni Konwar; Chiranjita Phukan
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2021-05-06

5.  What is the best method for debonding metallic brackets from the patient's perspective?

Authors:  Matheus Melo Pithon; Daniel Santos Fonseca Figueiredo; Dauro Douglas Oliveira; Raildo da Silva Coqueiro
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 2.750

6.  Does the CO2 laser reduce bond strength in different types of ceramic brackets?

Authors:  Fábio Lourenço Romano; Giovanna Pessoti; Rodrigo Galo; Jaciara Miranda Gomes-Silva; Marília Pacífico Lucisano; Maria Cristina Borsatto; Paulo Nelson-Filho
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr

7.  Effects of various debonding and adhesive clearance methods on enamel surface: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Xiao-Chuan Fan; Li Chen; Xiao-Feng Huang
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 2.757

8.  Optical coherence tomography assessment of the enamel surface after debonding the ceramic brackets using three different techniques.

Authors:  Maimoona Abdul Khader; Soorya Dileep; Abdul Gafoor A; Jijin Mj; Manisha Sunil; Parthiban Krishnaraj
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2022-05-04

9.  Effects of ultrasonic instrumentation with different scaler-tip angulations on the shear bond strength and bond failure mode of metallic orthodontic brackets.

Authors:  Giulio Alessandri Bonetti; Serena Incerti Parenti; Daniela Rit Ippolito; Maria Rosari Gatto; Checchi Luigi
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 1.372

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.