Literature DB >> 7660606

The form of the human pupil.

H J Wyatt1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to characterize the form of the pupil in normal human subjects. Using a modified slitlamp, photographs of pupils were taken in steady illumination and 10-20 sec after darkness. Transparencies were projected and digitized, and the pupil margin was represented as a circular Fourier series. Best-fit ellipses were also determined. The placement of the pupil relative to the limbus was determined in a number of subjects. Results from 23 subjects indicated that in both darkness and light, average pupil noncircularity was 0.0166. (A value of 0.0200 is easy to detect with the unaided eye from the photographs.) On average, the best-fit ellipse accounted for about half of the noncircularity (59.6% in darkness; 47.7% in light). Most of the contribution to shape was made by the first 4 or 5 harmonics. Shapes were usually stable within a session and could remain fairly stable for at least a year; however, shapes for different subjects were not very similar, especially in the light. (Average pairwise similarity: 0.106 in darkness; 0.034 in light; similarity can have values from -1 to 1.) For a given subject, shapes in light and dark were often fairly similar (average similarity 0.260), but there were systematic differences: in eyes where the ellipse contributed > 20% of noncircularity, ellipse major axes clustered around vertical in darkness, and horizontal in light, implying greater contraction near the vertical meridian. Even pupils with little elliptical contribution turned out to contract more near the vertical meridian. There was some tendency for left and right eyes of an individual to show mirror symmetry of shape. In the dark, pupils were located 0.27 +/- 0.09 mm nasal and 0.20 +/- 0.15 mm superior to the limbus center, and usually moved slightly further nasal or superior in the light. Noncircularity increased with age (0.0015/decade). It was concluded that pupils show individuality of shape, with significant regularities within and across subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7660606     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)00268-q

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  19 in total

1.  Pupil location under mesopic, photopic, and pharmacologically dilated conditions.

Authors:  Yabo Yang; Keith Thompson; Stephen A Burns
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 2.  Aberrations and accommodation.

Authors:  Antonio J Del Águila-Carrasco; Philip B Kruger; Francisco Lara; Norberto López-Gil
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 2.742

3.  Comparison of age-related changes between corneal and ocular aberration in young and mid-age myopic patients.

Authors:  Feng-Ju Zhang; Zheng Zhou; Fang-Lei Yu; Zhi-Li Lu; Ting Li; Meng-Meng Wang
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  The human pupil and the use of video-based eyetrackers.

Authors:  Harry J Wyatt
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Pupillometry as an index for cognitive processing in behavioral variant FrontoTemporal Dementia: a series of case studies.

Authors:  Mohamad El Haj; Dimitrios Kapogiannis; Claire Boutoleau-Bretonnière
Journal:  Neurocase       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 0.781

6.  The pupil and myself: pupil dilation during retrieval of self-defining memories.

Authors:  Mohamad El Haj; Quentin Lenoble; Ahmed A Moustafa
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 3.830

7.  Effect of topical pilocarpine on refractive surgery outcomes.

Authors:  Kemal Ozulken; Erdem Yuksel; Mehmet Murat Uzel
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 2.031

8.  There is more to accommodation of the eye than simply minimizing retinal blur.

Authors:  I Marín-Franch; A J Del Águila-Carrasco; P Bernal-Molina; J J Esteve-Taboada; N López-Gil; R Montés-Micó; P B Kruger
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 3.732

9.  The entrance pupil of the human eye: a three-dimensional model as a function of viewing angle.

Authors:  Cathleen Fedtke; Fabrice Manns; Arthur Ho
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2010-10-11       Impact factor: 3.894

10.  Investigation of the isoplanatic patch and wavefront aberration along the pupillary axis compared to the line of sight in the eye.

Authors:  Maciej Nowakowski; Matthew Sheehan; Daniel Neal; Alexander V Goncharov
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 3.732

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.