Literature DB >> 7660582

The accuracy and precision of saccades to small and large targets.

E Kowler1, E Blaser.   

Abstract

Subjects made saccades to point and spatially-extended targets located at a randomly-selected eccentricity (3.8-4.2 deg) under conditions designed to promote best possible accuracy based only on the visual information present in a single trial. Saccadic errors to point targets were small. The average difference between mean saccade size and target eccentricity was about 1% of eccentricity. Precision was excellent (SD = 5-6% of eccentricity), rivaling the precision of relative perceptual localization. This level of performance was maintained for targets up to 3 deg in diameter. Corrective saccades were infrequent and limited almost exclusively to the point targets. We conclude that the saccadic system has access to a precise representation of a central reference position within spatially-extended targets and that, when explicitly required to do so, the saccadic system is capable of demonstrating remarkably accurate and precise performance.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7660582     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)00255-k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  46 in total

1.  Eye-hand coordination in object manipulation.

Authors:  R S Johansson; G Westling; A Bäckström; J R Flanagan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Verbal instructions and top-down saccade control.

Authors:  U P Mosimann; J Felblinger; S J Colloby; R M Müri
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-10-02       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The relationship between spatial pooling and attention in saccadic and perceptual tasks.

Authors:  Elias H Cohen; Brian S Schnitzer; Timothy M Gersch; Manish Singh; Eileen Kowler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  The spatial scale of attention strongly modulates saccade latencies.

Authors:  Mark R Harwood; Laurent Madelain; Richard J Krauzlis; Josh Wallman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Amplitude changes in response to target displacements during human eye-head movements.

Authors:  Aaron L Cecala; Edward G Freedman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Stimulus-driven saccades are characterized by an invariant undershooting bias: no evidence for a range effect.

Authors:  Caitlin Gillen; Jeffrey Weiler; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Timing of saccadic eye movements during visual search for multiple targets.

Authors:  Chia-Chien Wu; Eileen Kowler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Latency and accuracy of saccades to somatosensory targets.

Authors:  Anthony Sullivan; Kerry Fitzmaurice; Larry A Abel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-19       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 9.  The significance of microsaccades for vision and oculomotor control.

Authors:  Han Collewijn; Eileen Kowler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Perceptual averaging governs antisaccade endpoint bias.

Authors:  Caitlin Gillen; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.