BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Single, oval lesions greater than 5 mm in diameter lying inferior to the lateral putamen (infraputaminal lacunes [IPLs]) seen on CT or MR images are commonly reported as lacunar infarcts. To determine the clinical relevance and underlying pathology of IPLs, we evaluated the imaging appearances, clinical features, vascular risk factors, and histopathology in patients with IPLs. METHODS: Consecutive MR scans were reviewed for the presence of IPLs. Serial patients seen in routine clinical practice with IPLs were also included. Vascular risk factors were obtained from a prescan questionnaire. Histology and microangiography were performed on postmortem material. A MEDLINE search for putaminal infarcts was performed to look for imaging lesions typical of IPLs. RESULTS: Three of 100 serial MR scans had IPLs (3%). Nine other patients with in vivo (7) or postmortem (2) MR scans had IPLs. No neurological symptoms could be related to the IPLs. There were no differences in age, hypertension, diabetes, or presence of cortical enlarged perivascular spaces (EPVSs) between patients with and without IPLs. Unlike infarcts, IPLs were isointense with the cerebrospinal fluid on proton density MR sequences. Histological correlation of three MR scans showed IPLs to be a single large EPVS, situated lateral to the anterior commissure. IPLs were located at a point where multiple lenticulostriates turn sharply dorsally. An IPL was the probable cause of the apparent infarct in six publications from peer-reviewed literature that linked different clinical signs to putaminal infarct. CONCLUSIONS: IPLs are EPVSs that can be differentiated from infarcts on proton density MR images.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Single, oval lesions greater than 5 mm in diameter lying inferior to the lateral putamen (infraputaminal lacunes [IPLs]) seen on CT or MR images are commonly reported as lacunar infarcts. To determine the clinical relevance and underlying pathology of IPLs, we evaluated the imaging appearances, clinical features, vascular risk factors, and histopathology in patients with IPLs. METHODS: Consecutive MR scans were reviewed for the presence of IPLs. Serial patients seen in routine clinical practice with IPLs were also included. Vascular risk factors were obtained from a prescan questionnaire. Histology and microangiography were performed on postmortem material. A MEDLINE search for putaminal infarcts was performed to look for imaging lesions typical of IPLs. RESULTS: Three of 100 serial MR scans had IPLs (3%). Nine other patients with in vivo (7) or postmortem (2) MR scans had IPLs. No neurological symptoms could be related to the IPLs. There were no differences in age, hypertension, diabetes, or presence of cortical enlarged perivascular spaces (EPVSs) between patients with and without IPLs. Unlike infarcts, IPLs were isointense with the cerebrospinal fluid on proton density MR sequences. Histological correlation of three MR scans showed IPLs to be a single large EPVS, situated lateral to the anterior commissure. IPLs were located at a point where multiple lenticulostriates turn sharply dorsally. An IPL was the probable cause of the apparent infarct in six publications from peer-reviewed literature that linked different clinical signs to putaminal infarct. CONCLUSIONS: IPLs are EPVSs that can be differentiated from infarcts on proton density MR images.
Authors: D C Bezerra; A R Sharrett; K Matsushita; R F Gottesman; D Shibata; T H Mosley; J Coresh; M Szklo; M S Carvalho; E Selvin Journal: Neurology Date: 2011-12-14 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Peter T Nelson; Charles D Smith; Erin A Abner; Frederick A Schmitt; Stephen W Scheff; Gregory J Davis; Jeffrey N Keller; Gregory A Jicha; Daron Davis; Wang Wang-Xia; Adria Hartman; Douglas G Katz; William R Markesbery Journal: Biochim Biophys Acta Date: 2008-08-22
Authors: J Gutierrez; M S V Elkind; C Dong; M Di Tullio; T Rundek; R L Sacco; C B Wright Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2017-03-24 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Tufail F Patankar; Dipayan Mitra; Anoop Varma; Julie Snowden; David Neary; Alan Jackson Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2005 Jun-Jul Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: William J Jagust; Ling Zheng; Danielle J Harvey; Wendy J Mack; Harry V Vinters; Michael W Weiner; William G Ellis; Chris Zarow; Dan Mungas; Bruce R Reed; Joel H Kramer; Norbert Schuff; Charles DeCarli; Helena C Chui Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Jose Gutierrez; Mitchell S V Elkind; Ken Cheung; Tatjana Rundek; Ralph L Sacco; Clinton B Wright Journal: J Hypertens Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 4.844