Literature DB >> 7659435

The Descriptor Differential Scale of Pain Intensity: an evaluation of item and scale properties.

Jason N Doctor1, Mark A Slater, Hampton J Atkinson.   

Abstract

Improved methods for pain measurement have both theoretical and clinical importance. This study evaluated the Descriptor Differential Scale (DDS) of Pain Intensity, a recent methodology designed for assessing pain reports in clinical samples. Experiment 1 evaluated the sensitivity of the measure to small changes in electrocutaneous stimulation relative to a traditional visual analogue scale (VAS) of pain intensity. Additionally, direct psychophysical scaling methods were employed to determine ratio-scale values for the DDS sensory items in relation to the electrocutaneous stimuli. This ratio scale was cross-validated by comparison with previously published ratio-scaled data from cross-modality matching pain intensity judgement studies. Experiment 2 evaluated the performance of the measure in both experimental and clinical pain samples, as well as the similarity of item-response patterns in each of these samples. Results indicate that the DDS of Pain Intensity is sensitive to small changes in electrocutaneous stimulation, has consistent ratio-scale properties across two different psychophysical methods, and demonstrates similar item-response patterns across divergent experimental and clinical samples. The results support the validity of the sensory DDS as a measure of pain intensity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7659435     DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(94)00180-M

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  7 in total

1.  A comparison of implant extrusion rates and postoperative pain after evisceration with immediate or delayed implants and after enucleation with implants.

Authors:  Don Liu
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2005

Review 2.  2017 HIVMA of IDSA Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Chronic Pain in Patients Living With HIV.

Authors:  R Douglas Bruce; Jessica Merlin; Paula J Lum; Ebtesam Ahmed; Carla Alexander; Amanda H Corbett; Kathleen Foley; Kate Leonard; Glenn Jordan Treisman; Peter Selwyn
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  Hospitalized patients quantify verbal pain intensity descriptors: methodological issues and values for 26 descriptors.

Authors:  Judith M Schlaeger; Kevin C Cain; Erin K Myklebust; Keesha L Powell-Roach; Brenda W Dyal; Diana J Wilkie
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 6.961

4.  A randomized controlled trial of gabapentin for chronic low back pain with and without a radiating component.

Authors:  J Hampton Atkinson; Mark A Slater; Edmund V Capparelli; Shetal M Patel; Tanya Wolfson; Anthony Gamst; Ian S Abramson; Mark S Wallace; Stephen D Funk; Thomas R Rutledge; Julie L Wetherell; Scott C Matthews; Sidney Zisook; Steven R Garfin
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 7.926

5.  Is low-dose amitriptyline effective in the management of chronic low back pain? Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Donna M Urquhart; Anita E Wluka; Malcolm R Sim; Maurits van Tulder; Andrew Forbes; Stephen J Gibson; Carolyn Arnold; Chris Fong; Shane N Anthony; Flavia M Cicuttini
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-10-22       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Contextual influences in decoding pain expressions: effects of patient age, informational priming, and observer characteristics.

Authors:  Amy J D Hampton; Thomas Hadjistavropoulos; Michelle M Gagnon
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 7.926

7.  The Clinical Relevance of Pain Severity Changes: Is There Any Difference Between Asian and Caucasian Patients With Osteoarthritis Pain?

Authors:  Li Yue; Jianing Wang; Hiroyuki Enomoto; Shinji Fujikoshi; Levent Alev; Yan Yolanda Cheng; Vladimir Skljarevski
Journal:  Pain Pract       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 3.183

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.