Literature DB >> 7658231

Simultaneous emission and transmission measurements for attenuation correction in whole-body PET.

S R Meikle1, D L Bailey, P K Hooper, S Eberl, B F Hutton, W F Jones, R R Fulton, M J Fulham.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: We describe a methodology for measuring and correcting for attenuation in whole-body PET using simultaneous emission and transmission (SET) measurements.
METHODS: The main components of the methodology are: (a) sinogram windowing of low activity (< or = 50 MBq) rotating 68Ge/Ga rod sources, (b) segmented attenuation correction (SAC) and (c) maximum likelihood reconstruction using the ordered subsets EM (OS-EM) algorithm. The methods were implemented on a whole-body positron emission tomograph. Quantitative accuracy and the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were measured for a thorax-tumor phantom as functions of acquisition time (range: 2-20 min per position).
RESULTS: When a typical rod source activity (200 MBq 68Ge/Ga) was used, emission SNR was 60% lower in simultaneous than in separate measurements. The difference was only 14% when the rods contained 45 MBq 68Ge/Ga. The SNR was further improved by SAC in conjunction with OS-EM reconstruction and the relative gain increased with increasing acquisition time. Quantitative estimates of tumor, liver and lung radioactivity agreed with values obtained from a separate high count measurement to within 8%, independent of acquisition time.
CONCLUSION: Attenuation correction of whole-body PET images is feasible using SET measurements. There is good quantitative agreement with conventional methods and increased noise is offset by the use of SAC and OS-EM reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7658231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  5 in total

1.  FDG-PET for preoperative differential diagnosis between benign and malignant soft tissue masses.

Authors:  J Aoki; H Watanabe; T Shinozaki; K Takagishi; M Tokunaga; Y Koyama; N Sato; K Endo
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2003-01-24       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Gliomatosis cerebri evaluated by 18Falpha-methyl tyrosine positron-emission tomography.

Authors:  N Sato; T Inoue; K Tomiyoshi; J Aoki; N Oriuchi; A Takahashi; T Otani; H Kurihara; T Sasaki; K Endo
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2003-09-13       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Hybrid imaging is the future of molecular imaging.

Authors:  Rj Hicks; Ewf Lau; Ds Binns
Journal:  Biomed Imaging Interv J       Date:  2007-07-01

4.  Imitation learning for improved 3D PET/MR attenuation correction.

Authors:  Kerstin Kläser; Thomas Varsavsky; Pawel Markiewicz; Tom Vercauteren; Alexander Hammers; David Atkinson; Kris Thielemans; Brian Hutton; M J Cardoso; Sébastien Ourselin
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 8.545

Review 5.  Multi-modality nuclear medicine imaging: artefacts, pitfalls and recommendations.

Authors:  Jorn A van Dalen; Wouter V Vogel; Frans H M Corstens; Wim J G Oyen
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2007-05-28       Impact factor: 3.909

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.