Literature DB >> 7657755

Sterilization reversal: fertility results.

J B Dubuisson1, C Chapron, C Nos, P Morice, F X Aubriot, P Garnier.   

Abstract

Fertility outcome following sterilization reversal by laparotomy was evaluated. We studied all sterilization reversals performed between January 1978 and December 1991; a total of 226 women were treated. Tubal anastomosis was performed according to the rules for microsurgery. The microsurgical technique comprised two main phases: preparation of the healthy tube segments and the anastomosis carried out on two layers. It was possible to study the subsequent fertility of 206 patients in all, as 20 patients were lost to follow-up (8.8%). Cumulative pregnancy rates were evaluated by life-table analysis. The overall intrauterine pregnancy rate, including births and miscarriages, was 69.9% (144 patients) after 2 years. The cumulative intrauterine pregnancy rate was 62% at 18 months. Analysis of the fertility results demonstrated that age was the most significant predictive factor. The cumulative intrauterine pregnancy rate at 2 years was 83.5% (61 cases) for patients < or = 33 years, 70% (35 cases) for patients aged 34-36 years, 62.5% (30 cases) for patients aged 37-39 years, and 51.4% (18 cases) for patients aged > or = 40 years. Even for patients aged approximately 40 years, microsurgical repermeabilization can be retained as the first choice rather than in-vitro fertilization.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age Factors; Demographic Analysis; Demographic Factors; Family Planning; Fertility; Fertility Measurements; Laparotomy; Life Table Method; Microsurgery; Population; Population Characteristics; Population Dynamics; Pregnancy Rate; Prospective Studies; Research Methodology; Research Report; Reversible Sterilization; Sterilization Reversal; Sterilization, Sexual; Studies; Surgery; Treatment; Tubal Reanastomosis

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7657755     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  5 in total

1.  Surgical competence of obstetrics and gynecology residents performing microsurgical tubal anastamoses.

Authors:  John L Frattarelli; Steve Hong; Grant D E McWilliams
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Robotic applications in reproductive endocrinology and infertility.

Authors:  Julie Sroga; Sejal Dharia Patel
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2008-02-28

Review 3.  Cost and efficacy comparison of in vitro fertilization and tubal anastomosis for women after tubal ligation.

Authors:  Lauren B Messinger; Connie E Alford; John M Csokmay; Melinda B Henne; Sunni L Mumford; James H Segars; Alicia Y Armstrong
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  A study on the reversal of sterilisation in women over two decades.

Authors:  R Premalatha; Maruti Sharan Tripathi
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2012-04-24

5.  Is surgical repair of the fallopian tubes ever appropriate?

Authors:  Ginter Sotrel
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.