Literature DB >> 7655964

Prospective randomised comparative study of pulse spray and conventional local thrombolysis.

S W Yusuf1, S C Whitaker, R H Gregson, P W Wenham, B R Hopkinson, G S Makin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the time required to achieve lysis with the pulse spray technique and the conventional slow continuous infusion technique.
DESIGN: Prospective randomised open Study.
METHODS: Eighteen patients suitable for intra-arterial thrombolytic therapy with conventional and pulse spray technique were randomised 1:1 to receive either pulse spray thrombolysis with 0.33 mg/ml rt-PA injected as a bolus of 0.2 ml or conventional thrombolysis with 0.05 mg/ml rt-PA infused at a rate of 10 ml/h.
RESULTS: The age, duration of symptoms, length of occlusion and prethrombolysis ankle brachial pressure index were comparable in the two groups. The median duration of thrombolytic therapy in the pulse spray group was 195 min (range 90-1260) compared to 1390 min (range 300-2400) in the Conventional group. The difference between the two groups was significant, p < 0.002 (Mann-Whitney test).
CONCLUSIONS: Significantly shorter time is required to achieve local thrombolysis with pulse spray compared to the conventional infusion method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7655964     DOI: 10.1016/s1078-5884(05)80104-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg        ISSN: 1078-5884            Impact factor:   7.069


  1 in total

Review 1.  Infusion techniques for peripheral arterial thrombolysis.

Authors:  Cathryn Broderick; Jai V Patel
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-11-17
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.