Literature DB >> 7655918

User satisfaction with in-patient mental health services.

K Lovell.   

Abstract

Although a wealth of literature regarding lay evaluation or satisfaction with health services exists, a paucity of literature is available about satisfaction with mental health services. Much of this literature is fraught with methodological problems. The study described, using both quantitative and qualitative methodology, investigated how users of in-patient mental health services evaluated these services with particular reference to the areas of the admission process, treatment, ward environment and safety. The findings confirmed the broad outcomes reported in the literature, in that they demonstrated the mismatch between quantitative and qualitative data. Global satisfaction ratings were generally positive; however, more specific questions yielded less positive outcomes. Semi-structured interviews reported some important areas of dissatisfaction, including a lack of information regarding treatment and services. Fears relating to safety were expressed equally by male and female users. Further work in this area is required with larger samples, and with specific reference to the experience of ethnic minorities and those detained under the Mental Health Act.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7655918     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.1995.tb00049.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs        ISSN: 1351-0126            Impact factor:   2.952


  4 in total

1.  The needs of primary care mental health service users: a Q-sort study.

Authors:  Mark Papworth; Leonie Walker
Journal:  Ment Health Fam Med       Date:  2008-12

2.  Are Users Satisfied with Assertive Community Treatment in Spite of Personal Restrictions?

Authors:  Ann-Mari Lofthus; Heidi Westerlund; Dagfinn Bjørgen; Jonas Christoffer Lindstrøm; Arnhild Lauveng; Hanne Clausen; Torleif Ruud; Kristin Sverdvik Heiervang
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2016-02-11

3.  What determines patients' satisfaction with their mental health care and quality of life?

Authors:  P Blenkiron; C A Hammill
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.401

4.  Contributory injustice in psychiatry.

Authors:  Alex James Miller Tate
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 2.903

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.