Literature DB >> 76554

Normal variability of the brain-stem auditory evoked response in young and old adult subjects.

M J Rowe.   

Abstract

The brain-stem auditory evoked response was studied under three combinations of intensity and rate of click stimulation in 25 young and 25 old adult subjects. The responses show a great intra and inter subject variability. Waves 1, 3 and 5 are constant and reproducible markers of the response while waves 2, 4, 6, and 7 are variable and frequently asymmetrical or absent. Wave peak latencies increase with an increase in stimulation rate, a decrease in stimulus intensity and an increase in age. Interpeak conduction times, except those involving wave 2, are unaffected by a change in stimulus intensity. Wave 1-3 time increases with an increase in stimulus rate and an increase in age while wave 3-5 time is not affected by any change in stimulus parameters or age. Wave amplitude alone is not a reliable measure of normality. Normal values for peak latencies, interpeak conduction times and interear symmetry are presented. One tailed 95 and 99% confidence intervals for normal interpeak conduction times are presented with appropriate corrections for stimulus rate used and patient age. No corrections need to be made for changes in stimulus intensity. This suggests that no correction is necessary when studying patients with conductive type hearing deficits. Laboratories using the same stimulation technique appear to produce equivalent normative conduction time values.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 76554     DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(78)90030-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  24 in total

1.  Evidence against brain stem cooling by face fanning in severely hyperthermic humans.

Authors:  B Nielsen; C Jessen
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.657

2.  Age-related changes in the auditory brainstem response.

Authors:  Dawn Konrad-Martin; Marilyn F Dille; Garnett McMillan; Susan Griest; Daniel McDermott; Stephen A Fausti; Donald F Austin
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.664

3.  Human auditory-evoked potentials before and after magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  M A Hotz; S Müller; J H Allum; C R Pfaltz
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Age-related changes in the compound action potentials of the eighth nerve in guinea pigs.

Authors:  I Nozawa; S Imamura; K Hashimoto; S Shimomura; Y Murakami
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Age-related changes of auditory brainstem responses in nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Chi-Wing Ng; Xochi Navarro; James R Engle; Gregg H Recanzone
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Auditory brain-stem potentials studied with paired stimuli in normals.

Authors:  C W Hess; H P Ludin
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  Age-related changes in the relationship between auditory brainstem responses and envelope-following responses.

Authors:  Aravindakshan Parthasarathy; Jyotishka Datta; Julie Ann Luna Torres; Charneka Hopkins; Edward L Bartlett
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-05-21

8.  Age-related changes in the auditory evoked brainstem potentials of albino and pigmented guinea pigs.

Authors:  N Dum; U Schmidt; H von Wedel
Journal:  Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1980

9.  Extraction of the constituent components of brain stem auditory evoked responses by a filtering and optimisation procedure.

Authors:  J G Thomas
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 2.602

10.  Computed tomographic correlates of auditory brainstem responses in alcoholics.

Authors:  N S Chu
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 10.154

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.