Literature DB >> 7655004

Effect of aggressive daunomycin therapy on survival in acute promyelocytic leukemia.

D Head1, K J Kopecky, J Weick, J C Files, D Ryan, K Foucar, M Montiel, J Bickers, A Fishleder, M Miller.   

Abstract

The Southwest Oncology Group analyzed outcome with cytotoxic chemotherapy for previously untreated acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML) from 1982 through 1986. Results with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) prompted comparison with patients from 1986 through 1991 and analysis of factors contributing to APL results. Patient and disease characteristics and treatment outcome were compared for all evaluable patients, with more detailed analysis of factors affecting APL treatment outcome. From 1982 through 1986, median survival and disease-free survival in 45 APL patients were 106 months and greater than 105 months, respectively, versus 6 and 14 months for 417 other AML patients. Such differences were not seen from 1986 through 1991. In the 141 APL patients from 1982 through 1991, after adjusting for significant patient and disease characteristics, higher daunomycin (DNR) doses during induction were significantly associated with higher complete remission rates (P < .0001), longer survival (P < .0001), and longer DFS (P < .0001). Cytosine arabinoside (Ara-C) induction dose, the inclusion of other chemotherapy agents in induction, postremission therapy (consolidation, maintenance, or bone marrow transplantation) other than DNR, APL subtype, and patient age did not appear to significantly affect outcome of APL, except for a significant detrimental effect of high-dose Ara-C in consolidation (P = .0042). Morphologic AML subtypes other than APL did not affect outcome. We conclude that high-dose DNR selectively increases survival in APL. This good survival is important for evaluation of combined all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA)/chemotherapy protocols and for planning future combinations of chemotherapy and ATRA. These results illustrate the need to individualize chemotherapy for subtypes of AML. Therapeutic response of APL is independent of age. Except for APL, morphologic subclassification of AML contributed little prognostic information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7655004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  13 in total

Review 1.  Is cytarabine required in the treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia?

Authors:  Lionel Adès; Pierre Fenaux
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 2.  New advances in the treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Dan Douer
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.490

3.  Phase I study of liposomal daunorubicin in patients with acute leukemia.

Authors:  J Cortes; S O'Brien; E Estey; F Giles; M Keating; H Kantarjian
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.850

4.  High efficacy and low toxicity of APL induction with concurrent idarubicin/ATRA followed by a novel and simplified outpatient post-remission therapy using single doses of idarubicin and intermittent ATRA.

Authors:  M Aljurf; F Al Qurashi; F Al Mohareb; E Sahovic; F Al Sharif; H Al Zahrani; A Al Shanqeeti; T Owaidah; A Iqbal; S Z A Zaidi; Z A Nurgat; M Sanz; N Chaudhri
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2009-08-08       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 5.  Acute promyelocytic leukaemia in the all trans retinoic acid era.

Authors:  T G DeLoughery; S H Goodnight
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.064

6.  Does microgranular variant morphology of acute promyelocytic leukemia independently predict a less favorable outcome compared with classical M3 APL? A joint study of the North American Intergroup and the PETHEMA Group.

Authors:  Martin S Tallman; Haesook T Kim; Pau Montesinos; Frederick R Appelbaum; Javier de la Serna; John M Bennett; Guillermo Deben; Clara D Bloomfield; Jose Gonzalez; James H Feusner; Marcos Gonzalez; Robert Gallagher; Jose D Gonzalez-San Miguel; Richard A Larson; Gustavo Milone; Elisabeth Paietta; Chelo Rayon; Jacob M Rowe; Concha Rivas; Charles A Schiffer; Edo Vellenga; Lois Shepherd; James L Slack; Peter H Wiernik; Cheryl L Willman; Miguel A Sanz
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 7.  Management of acute promyelocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Martin S Tallman; Chadi Nabhan
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.075

8.  Role of arsenic trioxide in acute promyelocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Harry J Iland; John F Seymour
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2013-06

Review 9.  Acute promyelocytic leukemia: where did we start, where are we now, and the future.

Authors:  C C Coombs; M Tavakkoli; M S Tallman
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 11.037

Review 10.  Acute promyelocytic leukemia.

Authors:  D Douer
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2000-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.