Literature DB >> 7654604

Regional variations in the relative sensitivity to UV light in the mouse retina.

J B Calderone1, G H Jacobs.   

Abstract

About 3% of all mouse photoreceptors are cones. An earlier electrophysiological study indicated that there were two classes of cone in the mouse retina having peak sensitivities (lambda max) of about 360 nm and 511 nm. Recent immunocytochemical results show there are two types of cones that have distinctive regional segregation patterns. We used regional stimulation of the retina in conjunction with electroretinogram (ERG) flicker photometry to see if the two cone types identified electrophysiologically are regionalized in a fashion suggested by the anatomical results. We find they are. Relative sensitivity to ultraviolet and visible light stimulation qualitatively parallels that predicted by immunocytochemical labelling. One result of this remarkable regionalization of cone types is that the mouse retina is relatively more sensitive to ultraviolet light stimulation when that light is directed toward the ventral half of the retina.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7654604     DOI: 10.1017/s0952523800008361

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vis Neurosci        ISSN: 0952-5238            Impact factor:   3.241


  19 in total

1.  Visual stimulation switches the polarity of excitatory input to starburst amacrine cells.

Authors:  Anna L Vlasits; Rémi Bos; Ryan D Morrie; Cécile Fortuny; John G Flannery; Marla B Feller; Michal Rivlin-Etzion
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Mice lacking G-protein receptor kinase 1 have profoundly slowed recovery of cone-driven retinal responses.

Authors:  A L Lyubarsky; C Chen; M I Simon; E N Pugh
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-03-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Chromatic properties of horizontal and ganglion cell responses follow a dual gradient in cone opsin expression.

Authors:  Lu Yin; Robert G Smith; Peter Sterling; David H Brainard
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Spectral and temporal sensitivity of cone-mediated responses in mouse retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Yanbin V Wang; Michael Weick; Jonathan B Demb
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Physiological features of the S- and M-cone photoreceptors of wild-type mice from single-cell recordings.

Authors:  Sergei S Nikonov; Roman Kholodenko; Janis Lem; Edward N Pugh
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.086

6.  Maps of cone opsin input to mouse V1 and higher visual areas.

Authors:  Issac Rhim; Gabriela Coello-Reyes; Hee-Kyoung Ko; Ian Nauhaus
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  What can mice tell us about how vision works?

Authors:  Andrew D Huberman; Cristopher M Niell
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 13.837

8.  Retinal development and function in a 'blind' mole.

Authors:  F David Carmona; Martin Glösmann; Jingxing Ou; Rafael Jiménez; J Martin Collinson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  UV- and midwave-sensitive cone-driven retinal responses of the mouse: a possible phenotype for coexpression of cone photopigments.

Authors:  A L Lyubarsky; B Falsini; M E Pennesi; P Valentini; E N Pugh
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Cone-based vision in the aging mouse.

Authors:  Gary A Williams; Gerald H Jacobs
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-05-16       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.