Literature DB >> 7654272

Effectiveness of interventions to enhance physician screening for breast cancer.

J Mandelblatt1, P A Kanetsky.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Physician recommendation is one of the strongest predictors of mammography use. This study was designed to review research articles assessing the effectiveness of interventions to enhance physician breast cancer screening behavior.
METHODS: A MEDLINE search was conducted to identify intervention studies published from January 1980 to April 1993. The search was supplemented by review of all related bibliographic references and recent listings in Current Contents.
RESULTS: Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for the 20 controlled trials identified by the search. The majority of studies were conducted in academic settings; two were community-based. Interventions included physician reminder systems, other office systems, audit with feedback, and physician education. The majority of trials included two or more intervention modalities; 65% included physician reminder systems. In university settings, physician reminders and audit with feedback each significantly increased use of mammography and clinical breast examination by approximately 5% to 20%. In community-based settings, the effects of physician education also had a positive impact on mammography and clinical breast examination rates, which ranged from 6% to 14%. Using patient education to influence physician behavior was not effective in university settings, but had a modest impact in community trials. Generally, reminders were more cost-efficient than audit with feedback.
CONCLUSIONS: Physician-based interventions can be effective in increasing screening use. Interventions should emphasize community practices and practices caring for underserved and older populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7654272

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Pract        ISSN: 0094-3509            Impact factor:   0.493


  29 in total

1.  Variation in recommendations for cancer screening among primary care physicians in New Mexico.

Authors:  C J Herman; R M Hoffman; K K Altobelli
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1999-08

Review 2.  Interventions to improve the delivery of preventive services in primary care.

Authors:  M E Hulscher; M Wensing; R P Grol; T van der Weijden; C van Weel
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Details of a successful clinical decision support system.

Authors:  Jeff Friedlin; Paul R Dexter; J Marc Overhage
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2007-10-11

4.  Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. The Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care Review Group.

Authors:  L A Bero; R Grilli; J M Grimshaw; E Harvey; A D Oxman; M A Thomson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-08-15

5.  Mammography screening for women in their 40s: facilitating truly informed decision making.

Authors:  J B Unger
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 6.  Riding the crest of the teachable moment: promoting long-term health after the diagnosis of cancer.

Authors:  Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Noreen M Aziz; Julia H Rowland; Bernardine M Pinto
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-07-25       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  A randomized controlled trial to increase cancer screening among attendees of community health centers.

Authors:  Richard G Roetzheim; Lisa K Christman; Paul B Jacobsen; Alan B Cantor; Jennifer Schroeder; Rania Abdulla; Seft Hunter; Thomas N Chirikos; Jeffrey P Krischer
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

8.  Part II, provider perspectives: should patients be activated to request evidence-based medicine? A qualitative study of the VA project to implement diuretics (VAPID).

Authors:  Colin D Buzza; Monica B Williams; Mark W Vander Weg; Alan J Christensen; Peter J Kaboli; Heather Schacht Reisinger
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 7.327

9.  The role of effective communication to enhance participation in screening mammography: a New Zealand case.

Authors:  Margaret A Brunton
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Access to mammography screening in a large urban population: a multi-level analysis.

Authors:  Stephen C Meersman; Nancy Breen; Linda W Pickle; Helen I Meissner; Paul Simon
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2009-06-20       Impact factor: 2.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.