Literature DB >> 7652164

DNA repair by thiols in air shows two radicals make a double-strand break.

J R Milligan1, J Y Ng, C C Wu, J A Aguilera, R C Fahey, J F Ward.   

Abstract

Using agarose gel electrophoresis, we have measured the yields of DNA single- and double-strand breaks (SSBs and DSBs) for plasmid DNA gamma-irradiated in aerobic aqueous solution. The presence during irradiation of either of the thiols cysteamine or N-(2-thioethyl)-1,3-diaminopropane (WR-1065) resulted in a concentration-dependent decrease in the yield of SSBs and a much greater decrease in the yield of DSBs. This large differential protective effect was not produced by thioethers or an alcohol of structural similarity to the two thiols, suggesting that repair of DSB radical precursors by thiols is more efficient than for SSB precursors. These observations suggest the existence of a diradical intermediate in the formation of DSBs. The results argue against a major contribution by a single radical mechanism involving interstrand radical transfer via hydrogen abstraction by a peroxyl intermediate, since the half-life of this radical transfer reaction appears to be significantly greater than the lifetime of the intermediate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7652164

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  14 in total

1.  The yield of strand breaks resulting from direct-type effects in crystalline DNA X-irradiated at 4 K and room temperature.

Authors:  M G Debije; Y Razskazovskiy; W A Bernhard
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2001-03-28       Impact factor: 15.419

2.  Nucleosomes effectively shield DNA from radiation damage in living cells.

Authors:  Francesca Brambilla; Jose Manuel Garcia-Manteiga; Emanuele Monteleone; Lena Hoelzen; Angelica Zocchi; Alessandra Agresti; Marco E Bianchi
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Novel method for quantifying radiation-induced single-strand-break yields in plasmid DNA highlights 10-fold discrepancy.

Authors:  Pichumani Balagurumoorthy; S James Adelstein; Amin I Kassis
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 3.365

4.  Reactivity of Nucleic Acid Radicals.

Authors:  Marc M Greenberg
Journal:  Adv Phys Org Chem       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.833

Review 5.  Sources of DNA double-strand breaks and models of recombinational DNA repair.

Authors:  Anuja Mehta; James E Haber
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 10.005

6.  Probing Enhanced Double-Strand Break Formation at Abasic Sites within Clustered Lesions in Nucleosome Core Particles.

Authors:  Samya Banerjee; Supratim Chakraborty; Marco Paolo Jacinto; Michael D Paul; Morgan V Balster; Marc M Greenberg
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  What fraction of DNA double-strand breaks produced by the direct effect is accounted for by radical pairs?

Authors:  Anita R Peoples; Kermit R Mercer; William A Bernhard
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 2.991

8.  Enabling large-scale genome editing at repetitive elements by reducing DNA nicking.

Authors:  Cory J Smith; Oscar Castanon; Khaled Said; Verena Volf; Parastoo Khoshakhlagh; Amanda Hornick; Raphael Ferreira; Chun-Ting Wu; Marc Güell; Shilpa Garg; Alex H M Ng; Hannu Myllykallio; George M Church
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 9.  The chemistry and biology of nitroxide compounds.

Authors:  Benjamin P Soule; Fuminori Hyodo; Ken-Ichiro Matsumoto; Nicole L Simone; John A Cook; Murali C Krishna; James B Mitchell
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2007-03-12       Impact factor: 7.376

10.  DNA double strand cleavage via interstrand hydrogen atom abstraction.

Authors:  Marisa L Taverna Porro; Marc M Greenberg
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 15.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.