Literature DB >> 7652060

A comparison of factors affecting aesthetic outcomes of TRAM flap breast reconstructions.

S S Kroll1, J A Coffey, R J Winn, M A Schusterman.   

Abstract

The aesthetic results of TRAM flap breast reconstructions were assessed in 237 consecutive breast cancer patients. Nine independent judges, none of whom were plastic surgeons or members of the reconstructive team, assigned an aesthetic score to each patient after viewing postoperative photographs. We found that bilateral reconstructions were aesthetically superior to unilateral reconstructions (p = 0.0013), that immediate reconstructions were aesthetically superior to delayed reconstructions (p = 0.0001), and that previous irradiation of the chest wall reduced the mean aesthetic score (p = 0.0010). We also found that the mean aesthetic score assigned to patients who had reconstructions with free TRAM flaps was superior to that assigned to those who had reconstructions with conventional TRAM flaps, but when tested by multiple regression analysis, this trend was not statistically significant (p = 0.2972).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7652060     DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199509001-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  10 in total

Review 1.  Skin-sparing mastectomy.

Authors:  Eduardo G González; Alberto O Rancati
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-12

Review 2.  Breast reconstruction.

Authors:  S Ahmed; A Snelling; M Bains; I H Whitworth
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-04-23

3.  The modified B-mammoplasty incision: an alternative skin-conserving technique for mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction.

Authors:  D A Munnoch; P E Preece; J H Stevenson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 4.  Radiotherapy and breast reconstruction: oncology, cosmesis and complications.

Authors:  Warren M Rozen; Mark W Ashton
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2012-08

5.  Breast reconstruction and adjuvant therapies.

Authors:  Steven J Kronowitz; Geoffrey L Robb
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.314

Review 6.  Achieving autologous breast reconstruction for breast cancer patients in the setting of post-mastectomy radiotherapy.

Authors:  Namrata S Anavekar; Warren M Rozen; Cara M Le Roux; Mark W Ashton
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 4.442

7.  Outcomes of immediate versus delayed breast reconstruction: Results of a multicenter prospective study.

Authors:  Alfred P Yoon; Ji Qi; David L Brown; Hyungjin M Kim; Jennifer B Hamill; Jessica Erdmann-Sager; Andrea L Pusic; Edwin G Wilkins
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 4.380

8.  Genetically modified lentiviruses that preserve microvascular function protect against late radiation damage in normal tissues.

Authors:  Aadil A Khan; James T Paget; Martin McLaughlin; Joan N Kyula; Michelle J Wilkinson; Timothy Pencavel; David Mansfield; Victoria Roulstone; Rohit Seth; Martin Halle; Navita Somaiah; Jessica K R Boult; Simon P Robinson; Hardev S Pandha; Richard G Vile; Alan A Melcher; Paul A Harris; Kevin J Harrington
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 17.956

9.  Initial Experience Using Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy after Immediate Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Allen Gabriel; Steven R Sigalove; G Patrick Maxwell
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-07-22

10.  Satisfaction following Unilateral Breast Reconstruction: A Comparison of Pedicled TRAM and Free Abdominal Flaps.

Authors:  Jonathan A Schwitzer; H Catherine Miller; Andrea L Pusic; Evan Matros; Babak J Mehrara; Colleen M McCarthy; Peter A Lennox; Nancy Van Laeken; Joseph J Disa
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2015-08-19
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.