Literature DB >> 7650011

Kinetic analysis of interactions between GroEL and reduced alpha-lactalbumin. Effect of GroES and nucleotides.

N Murai1, H Taguchi, M Yoshida.   

Abstract

The real-time analysis of the association and dissociation of chaperonin with respect to its substrate protein was carried out using the BIAcore system. We immobilized alpha-lactalbumin (LA) as a substrate protein on the sensor chip and the GroEL solution was passed over it. Whereas GroEL did not bind to the immobilized native LA, it associated with the immobilized Ca(2+)-depleted, disulfide bond-reduced form of LA (rLA) rapidly (kon = 1.96 x 10(5) M-1 S-1) and dissociated extremely slowly (koff = 2.08 x 10(-4) S-1), giving a low dissociation constant (KD = 1.06 nM). MgATP greatly accelerated the dissociation (koff = 0.15 +/- 0.02 S-1). The KD value remained almost unchanged when GroES and/or 10 microM ADP was included in the GroEL solution. However, when 1 mM ADP was included, the KD value of GroEL increased by 2 orders of magnitude solely due to the change in koff. When GroES and 1 mM ADP were included, no interaction with rLA was detected due to changes in both kon and koff. These results indicate that GroEL/ES has high and low affinity ADP binding sites and that occupation of the low affinity sites by ADP was responsible for the loss of ability to interact with the substrate protein. The effect of excess GroES on the preformed GroEL.rLA and GroEL/ES.rLA complexes was also examined. With increasing GroES, the dissociation of GroEL and GroEL/ES from rLA was accelerated, and thus the possibility is suggested that the substrate protein and GroES compete for the same site on GroEL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7650011     DOI: 10.1074/jbc.270.34.19957

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  7 in total

1.  Both the isomerase and chaperone activities of protein disulfide isomerase are required for the reactivation of reduced and denatured acidic phospholipase A2.

Authors:  Y Yao; Y Zhou; C Wang
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1997-02-03       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  Protein folding: how the mechanism of GroEL action is defined by kinetics.

Authors:  C Frieden; A C Clark
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-05-27       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  GroEL-mediated protein folding.

Authors:  W A Fenton; A L Horwich
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Probing structurally altered and aggregated states of therapeutically relevant proteins using GroEL coupled to bio-layer interferometry.

Authors:  Subhashchandra Naik; Ozan S Kumru; Melissa Cullom; Srivalli N Telikepalli; Elizabeth Lindboe; Taylor L Roop; Sangeeta B Joshi; Divya Amin; Phillip Gao; C Russell Middaugh; David B Volkin; Mark T Fisher
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 5.  On the design of broad based screening assays to identify potential pharmacological chaperones of protein misfolding diseases.

Authors:  Subhashchandra Naik; Na Zhang; Phillip Gao; Mark T Fisher
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Protein folding on biosensor tips: folding of maltodextrin glucosidase monitored by its interactions with GroEL.

Authors:  Ashutosh Pastor; Amit K Singh; Mark T Fisher; Tapan K Chaudhuri
Journal:  FEBS J       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 5.542

7.  Chaperonin-Based Biolayer Interferometry To Assess the Kinetic Stability of Metastable, Aggregation-Prone Proteins.

Authors:  Wendy A Lea; Pierce T O'Neil; Alexandra J Machen; Subhashchandra Naik; Tapan Chaudhri; Wesley McGinn-Straub; Alexander Tischer; Matthew T Auton; Joshua R Burns; Michael R Baldwin; Karen R Khar; John Karanicolas; Mark T Fisher
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 3.162

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.