Literature DB >> 7649374

Three-dimensional localization of wild-type and myosin II mutant cells during morphogenesis of Dictyostelium.

D A Knecht1, E Shelden.   

Abstract

Dictyostelium amoebae that lack myosin II (mhcA-) are unable to undergo morphogenesis. The cells aggregate slowly to form hemispherical mounds, but the mounds never extend a tip upward. Expression of developmentally regulated genes appears normal in the absence of morphogenesis. When mixed with an excess of wild-type cells, some mutant cells form differentiated spores; however, rescue is extremely inefficient (Knecht and Loomis, 1988). In order to assess how morphogenesis is normally accomplished and why mutants lacking myosin II cannot develop, a new method has been developed that allows individual amoebae to be localized and tracked at high resolution within the multicellular organism during development. Amoebae are labeled with a fluorescent dye at the beginning of starvation, mixed with an excess of unlabeled cells, and allowed to develop. The three-dimensional position of labeled cells in the multicellular organism is then determined using a laser scanning confocal microscope. Using this methodology, we have shown that labeled wild-type cells are randomly distributed throughout the organism and complete development normally. When labeled mhcA- mutant cells are mixed with a 20-fold excess of wild-type cells, they are non-randomly localized even at the earliest stages of development. Mutant cells in aggregation streams are found primarily at the edges of the streams and many cells never become part of the streams or are left behind as the wild-type cells complete aggregation. Those that are incorporated into the aggregate are found at the edge and base, the backs of slugs and the base of the fruiting bodies. A few mutant cells can be found in the sorus, where they presumably become spores. The segregation of mhcA- mutant cells to the outside of the wild-type aggregation streams argues that the mutant cells are unable to penetrate a mass of adhered, wild-type cells. We hypothesize that mutant cells lacking cortical integrity are unable to generate sufficient protrusive force to break the adhesion of wild-type cells to each other. This would make the mutants incapable of moving through a mass of cells (either mutant or wild type) or of changing shape when adhered to other cells. We propose that mutants lacking myosin II are unable to accomplish morphogenesis because they cannot move correctly in a three-dimensional mass of adhered cells.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7649374     DOI: 10.1006/dbio.1995.1227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Biol        ISSN: 0012-1606            Impact factor:   3.582


  12 in total

1.  The Dictyostelium LIM domain-containing protein LIM2 is essential for proper chemotaxis and morphogenesis.

Authors:  S Chien; C Y Chung; S Sukumaran; N Osborne; S Lee; C Ellsworth; J G McNally; R A Firtel
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.138

2.  In vivo observations of myosin II dynamics support a role in rear retraction.

Authors:  P A Clow; J G McNally
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 3.  Dictyostelium finds new roles to model.

Authors:  Jeffrey G Williams
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Autophosphorylation activates Dictyostelium myosin II heavy chain kinase A by providing a ligand for an allosteric binding site in the alpha-kinase domain.

Authors:  Scott W Crawley; Mojdeh Samimi Gharaei; Qilu Ye; Yidai Yang; Barak Raveh; Nir London; Ora Schueler-Furman; Zongchao Jia; Graham P Côté
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Second-site noncomplementation identifies genomic regions required for Drosophila nonmuscle myosin function during morphogenesis.

Authors:  S R Halsell; D P Kiehart
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Assessment of development and chemotaxis in Dictyostelium discoideum mutants.

Authors:  Yulia Artemenko; Kristen F Swaney; Peter N Devreotes
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2011

7.  Genetic analysis demonstrates a direct link between rho signaling and nonmuscle myosin function during Drosophila morphogenesis.

Authors:  S R Halsell; B I Chu; D P Kiehart
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Automated characterization of cell shape changes during amoeboid motility by skeletonization.

Authors:  Yuan Xiong; Cathryn Kabacoff; Jonathan Franca-Koh; Peter N Devreotes; Douglas N Robinson; Pablo A Iglesias
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2010-03-24

9.  How a cell crawls and the role of cortical myosin II.

Authors:  David R Soll; Deborah Wessels; Spencer Kuhl; Daniel F Lusche
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2009-07-24

10.  A developmentally regulated kinesin-related motor protein from Dictyostelium discoideum.

Authors:  E L de Hostos; G McCaffrey; R Sucgang; D W Pierce; R D Vale
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.138

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.