Literature DB >> 7648588

Carbon dioxide gas as a venous contrast agent to guide upper-arm insertion of central venous catheters.

S T Hahn1, T Pfammatter, K J Cho.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Evaluate in a prospective randomized study carbon dioxide (CO2) gas compared to iodinated contrast agent for image-guided placement of peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICCs).
METHODS: The upper-arm approach to the central vein was used for placement of PICCs in 74 patients requiring intermediate or long-term central venous access. Fluoroscopy was used to obtain venous access during peripheral injection of CO2 (n = 41) or low osmolar contrast material (Omnipaque 240 mgI/ml) (n = 33).
RESULTS: Placement of PICCs was accomplished in 88% of the CO2 group and in 100% of the contrast group, with a mean venipuncture of two in both groups. Venous access was unsuccessful in five patients with CO2 due to a small vein, venous spasm, or technical failure. The mean and range of procedure times were 22.8 min (13-64 min) with CO2 and 23.2 min (12-60 min) with contrast material. The average and range of CO2 and nonionic contrast volumes injected during the procedure were 35.4 ml (5-300 ml) and 27.8 ml (8-120 ml), respectively. Vital signs and oxygen saturation did not change significantly during or after injection of CO2. There was no incidence of adverse reaction following CO2 injection.
CONCLUSION: CO2 gas is a useful contrast agent to guide upper-arm insertion of PICCs and may be a safe alternative in patients with renal insufficiency and/or allergy to iodinated contrast material.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7648588     DOI: 10.1007/bf00204139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol        ISSN: 0174-1551            Impact factor:   2.740


  11 in total

1.  Experimental studies in acute retroperitoneal carbon dioxide insufflation.

Authors:  B M HARVARD; R R WHITE; J F WALSH
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1959-03       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  The diagnosis of pericardial effusion with intracardiac carbon dioxide.

Authors:  J H SCATLIFF; A J KUMMER; A H JANZEN
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1959-12       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  The upper arm approach for placement of peripherally inserted central catheters for protracted venous access.

Authors:  J C Andrews; M V Marx; D M Williams; I Sproat; S C Walker-Andrews
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 4.  Radiologic placement of long-term central venous catheters: a review.

Authors:  M A Mauro; P F Jaques
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  1993 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.464

5.  Techniques for peripheral insertion of central venous catheters.

Authors:  D M Hovsepian; J Bonn; D J Eschelman
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  1993 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.464

6.  Carbon dioxide cineangiocardiography in the diagnosis of pericardial disease.

Authors:  A F Turner; H I Meyers; G Jacobson; W Lo
Journal:  Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med       Date:  1966-06

7.  Interventional radiologic placement of peripherally inserted central catheters.

Authors:  J F Cardella; P S Fox; J B Lawler
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  1993 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.464

8.  Acute renal dysfunction after major arteriography.

Authors:  A S Gomes; J D Baker; V Martin-Paredero; S M Dixon; H Takiff; H I Machleder; W S Moore
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Clinical applications of carbon dioxide/digital subtraction arteriography.

Authors:  F A Weaver; M J Pentecost; A E Yellin; S Davis; E Finck; G Teitelbaum
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 4.268

10.  Carbon dioxide digital subtraction arteriography.

Authors:  I F Hawkins
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 3.959

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.