OBJECTIVE: To examine whether the reduction in mortality after standard titre measles immunisation in developing countries can be explained simply by the prevention of acute measles and its long term consequences. DESIGN: An analysis of all studies comparing mortality of unimmunised children and children immunised with standard titre measles vaccine in developing countries. STUDIES: 10 cohort and two case-control studies from Bangladesh, Benin, Burundi, Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Senegal, and Zaire. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Protective efficacy of standard titre measles immunisation against all cause mortality. Extent to which difference in mortality between immunised and unimmunised children could be explained by prevention of measles disease. RESULTS: Protective efficacy against death after measles immunisation ranged from 30% to 86%. Efficacy was highest in the studies with short follow up and when children were immunised in infancy (range 44-100%). Vaccine efficacy against death was much greater than the proportion of deaths attributed to acute measles disease. In four studies from Guinea-Bissau, Senegal, and Burundi vaccine efficacy against death remained almost unchanged when cases of measles were excluded from the analysis. Diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis and polio vaccinations were not associated with reduction in mortality. CONCLUSION: These observations suggest that standard titre measles vaccine may confer a beneficial effect which is unrelated to the specific protection against measles disease.
OBJECTIVE: To examine whether the reduction in mortality after standard titre measles immunisation in developing countries can be explained simply by the prevention of acute measles and its long term consequences. DESIGN: An analysis of all studies comparing mortality of unimmunised children and children immunised with standard titre measles vaccine in developing countries. STUDIES: 10 cohort and two case-control studies from Bangladesh, Benin, Burundi, Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Senegal, and Zaire. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Protective efficacy of standard titre measles immunisation against all cause mortality. Extent to which difference in mortality between immunised and unimmunised children could be explained by prevention of measles disease. RESULTS: Protective efficacy against death after measles immunisation ranged from 30% to 86%. Efficacy was highest in the studies with short follow up and when children were immunised in infancy (range 44-100%). Vaccine efficacy against death was much greater than the proportion of deaths attributed to acute measles disease. In four studies from Guinea-Bissau, Senegal, and Burundi vaccine efficacy against death remained almost unchanged when cases of measles were excluded from the analysis. Diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis and polio vaccinations were not associated with reduction in mortality. CONCLUSION: These observations suggest that standard titre measles vaccine may confer a beneficial effect which is unrelated to the specific protection against measles disease.
Entities:
Keywords:
Child Health; Child Mortality; Delivery Of Health Care; Demographic Factors; Developing Countries; Diseases; Health; Health Services; Immunization; Measles; Mortality; Population; Population Dynamics; Primary Health Care; Research Report; Viral Diseases
Authors: P Aaby; K Knudsen; T G Jensen; J Thårup; A Poulsen; M Sodemann; M C da Silva; H Whittle Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 1990-11 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: P Aaby; I R Pedersen; K Knudsen; M C da Silva; C H Mordhorst; N C Helm-Petersen; B S Hansen; J Thårup; A Poulsen; M Sodemann Journal: Pediatr Infect Dis J Date: 1989-04 Impact factor: 2.129
Authors: J D Clemens; B F Stanton; J Chakraborty; S Chowdhury; M R Rao; M Ali; S Zimicki; B Wojtyniak Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 1988-12 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: M A Koenig; M A Khan; B Wojtyniak; J D Clemens; J Chakraborty; V Fauveau; J F Phillips; J Akbar; U S Barua Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 1990 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: Adam Edvin Roth; Christine Stabell Benn; Henrik Ravn; Amabelia Rodrigues; Ida Maria Lisse; Maria Yazdanbakhsh; Hilton Whittle; Peter Aaby Journal: BMJ Date: 2010-03-15