Literature DB >> 7646211

Perioperative events in patients with failed mechanical and bioprosthetic valves.

L B McGrath1, J Fernandez, G W Laub, W A Anderson, B M Bailey, C Chen.   

Abstract

From 1963 through 1991, 1037 patients underwent reoperative valvular procedures. The 478 patients having reoperations for either failed bioprosthetic (n = 212) or mechanical (n = 266) valves were evaluated. There were 210 male (44%) and 268 female (56%) patients. The mean age at reoperation of the patients in the bioprosthesis group was 59.7 years and and that in the mechanical valve group was 56.1 years (p = 0.0006). The mean interval to the time of reoperation was 84.7 months in the mechanical valve group and 74 months in the bioprosthesis group. There was no difference between the two groups in the functional class at reoperation. More severe mitral valve stenosis and incompetence, more severe aortic valve stenosis, and higher right ventricular and pulmonary arterial pressures were noted in the bioprosthesis group than in the mechanical valve group. Hemolysis (p = 0.05) was more prevalent in the patients with mechanical valves than in the ones with bioprostheses. A longer aortic occlusion time (p = 0.0001) and longer cardiopulmonary bypass time (p = 0.0001) were required for the reoperations in the bioprosthesis group. The operative mortality was 13.2% for the bioprosthesis patients and 12.4% for the mechanical valve patients. The risk factors for hospital death included the cross-clamp time (p = 0.0001), the functional class (p = 0.00001), the presence of ascites (p = 0.02), hepatomegaly (p = 0.002), and decreasing ejection fraction (p = 0.05). We conclude that mechanical valve failures do not produce catastrophic events resulting in poor reoperative results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7646211     DOI: 10.1016/0003-4975(95)00444-p

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  2 in total

1.  Reoperative Mitral Surgery Versus Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Aditya Sengupta; Farhang Yazdchi; Sophia L Alexis; Edward Percy; Akash Premkumar; Sameer Hirji; Vinayak N Bapat; Deepak L Bhatt; Tsuyoshi Kaneko; Gilbert H L Tang
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 5.501

2.  A curious case of raised gradient across mitral bioprosthetic valve.

Authors:  Monish S Raut; Vijay Mohan Hanjoora; Murtaza A Chishti; Akhil Govil; Rakesh Pandey; Aman Jyoti; Ravi Kumar Mahavar; Shweta Suri Kandpal; Dileep Kumar Singh Rathor
Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.