Literature DB >> 7646176

The Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: clinical experience with 600 patients.

L C Pelletier1, M Carrier, Y Leclerc, I Dyrda.   

Abstract

Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprostheses were implanted in 600 patients: 416 aortic valve replacement, 115 mitral valve replacement, 6 isolated tricuspid, and 63 multiple valve replacements. The survival rates were 70% at 10 years after aortic valve replacement, 62% 8 years after mitral valve replacement, and 57% at 8 years with multiple valve replacement. Overall, 69 patients suffered one or more valve-related complications. The 10-year freedom rates from embolism were 91% (aortic valve replacement), 92% (mitral valve replacement), and 89% (multiple valve replacement), and those from endocarditis were 95%, 93%, and 85%, respectively. In 18 of the 35 patients, reoperation was due to primary valve dysfunction. Freedom from primary dysfunction was 87% at 10 years with aortic valve replacement, and at 8 years, it was 79% with mitral valve replacement and 77% with multiple valve replacement. A direct correlation was found between freedom from valve dysfunction and age of the patient at operation, with a 10-year-free rate of 90% among patients older than 59 years. This bioprosthesis has an excellent durability up to 10 years in the aortic position. More data regarding its long-term durability in the mitral position are needed. It is currently our valve substitute of choice when a bioprosthesis is indicated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7646176     DOI: 10.1016/0003-4975(95)00226-b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  8 in total

1.  Difference in structural change in the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valves implanted in the mitral and tricuspid positions.

Authors:  T Ohata; I Kigawa; Y Wanibuchi
Journal:  Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2000-04

Review 2.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation and mitral valve repair: state of the art.

Authors:  C E Ruiz
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.655

3.  Carpentier-Edwards pericardial aortic valve in middle-aged patients: comparison with the St. Jude Medical valve.

Authors:  Yoshimasa Sakamoto; Kazuhiro Hashimoto; Hiroshi Okuyama; Shinichi Ishii; Takahiro Inoue; Katsushi Kinouchi; Takayuki Abe
Journal:  Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2005-09

4.  The case of an explanted 16-year-old mitral Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis.

Authors:  Hiroomi Murayama; Takashi Watanabe; Takashi Yano; Naoki Kida; Yuki Hatano; Keiji Ohara; Atsukata Kobayashi
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 1.731

5.  Primary echocardiographic results of the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna.

Authors:  Hiroki Mizoguchi; Masayuki Sakaki; Kazushige Inoue; Yasuhiko Kobayashi; Takashi Iwata; Yasuo Suehiro; Takuya Miura
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 1.314

6.  Quality of life before and after heart valve surgery is influenced by gender and type of valve.

Authors:  Marie-Christine Taillefer; Gilles Dupuis; Jean-François Hardy; Sylvie LeMay
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Hemodynamic Performance of Pericardial Bioprostheses in the Aortic Position.

Authors:  Haeju Lee; Ho Young Hwang; Suk Ho Sohn; Jae Woong Choi; Jun-Bean Park; Kyung Hwan Kim; Ki-Bong Kim
Journal:  Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2020-10-05

8.  Evaluation and management of aortic valve and root disease.

Authors:  John B de Graft-Johnson; Thomas G Gleason
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2007-12
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.