Literature DB >> 7645791

Evaluation of a clinical recovery score after general anesthesia.

C L Quinn1, J M Weaver, M Beck.   

Abstract

A clinical recovery score (CRS) assessing recovery after general anesthesia was compared with the Digit-Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), Trieger Test (TT), a patient-completed visual analogue scale for alertness (VAS), and an independent observer's evaluation of recovery. The CRS included ratings of the following parameters: activity, respiration, circulation, consciousness, ambulation, color, and nausea and vomiting. Forty patients requiring the removal of three or four third molars participated in the study. All patients received the same general anesthetic technique. Each patient was evaluated by the five methods preoperatively, on admission to the recovery room, and at 15-min intervals until discharge. The four recovery tests (CRS, DSST, TT, VAS) were evaluated using chi 2 analysis to determine if there was any overall difference among the tests using the observer's determination of home readiness as the standard for discharge. The CRS was significantly more in agreement with the observer's determination than were the paper and pencil tests. The recovery tests were also evaluated with regard to instances of early dismissal or prolonged retention of the patient, again using the observer's determination as the "gold standard." The CRS was the only recovery test devoid of early dismissals. We conclude that the CRS provides a valid, simple measure of recovery that can be readily used in offices providing outpatient anesthesia and in studies measuring clinical recovery from anesthesia or sedation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 7645791      PMCID: PMC2148743     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Prog        ISSN: 0003-3006


  14 in total

1.  Comparison of Dot test and digit-symbol test for street fitness of outpatients.

Authors:  J G Ritter; N Anderson
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1976 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  Recovery after intravenous sedation. A comparison of clinical and paper and pencil tests used in assessing late effects of diazepam.

Authors:  K Korttila
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 6.955

3.  Tests of recovery from anaesthesia and sedation: intravenous diazepam in dentistry.

Authors:  R A Dixon; J A Thornton
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1973-02       Impact factor: 9.166

4.  A postanesthetic recovery score.

Authors:  J A Aldrete; D Kroulik
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1970 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.108

5.  Measuring recovery from anesthesia--a simple test.

Authors:  M G Newman; N Trieger; J C Miller
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1969 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  An objective measure of recovery.

Authors:  N Trieger; M G Newman; J C Miller
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  1969-01

7.  Comparison of recovery tests after intravenous sedation with diazepam-methohexital and diazepam-methohexital and fentanyl.

Authors:  S S Gelfman; R H Gracely; E J Driscoll; P R Wirdzek; D P Butler; J B Sweet
Journal:  J Oral Surg       Date:  1979-06

8.  Profile of recovery after general anaesthesia.

Authors:  M Herbert; T E Healy; J B Bourke; I R Fletcher; J M Rose
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1983-05-14

9.  Choice reaction time. A method of measuring postoperative psychomotor performance decrements.

Authors:  W A Scott; J G Whitwam; R T Wilkinson
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 6.955

10.  Time course of mental and psychomotor effects of 30 per cent nitrous oxide during inhalation and recovery.

Authors:  K Korttila; M M Ghoneim; L Jacobs; S P Mewaldt; R C Petersen
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 7.892

View more
  2 in total

1.  Kinematic measures provide useful information after intracranial aneurysm treatment.

Authors:  Rachael K Raw; Richard M Wilkie; Mark Mon-Williams; Stuart A Ross; Kenan Deniz; Tony Goddard; Tufail Patankar
Journal:  J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng       Date:  2017-12-04

2.  Dexmedetomidine decreases requirement of thiopentone sodium and pentazocine followed with improved recovery in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Suchit Khanduja; Anil Ohri; Manoj Panwar
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.